Jump to content

Talk:Karen (slang)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Karen (pejorative))

New question

[edit]
I'm very perplexed by how racialized this article is. The vast, vast majority of Karen interactions online do not involve a racial element but reading this you would think they all so. 2601:19C:527F:FB00:C1F1:56AB:8204:F92D (talk) 19:37, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I assume what you're talking about is things like asking to speak to the manager rather than calling the cops? It's probably pretty likely those kinds of interactions don't get covered in media, so yeah, unless someone is discussing that somewhere, we don't have a source for inclusion. If you have a source saying something like "the vast majority of Karen interactions do not involve a racial element", we can add that. Without a source, we really can't. Valereee (talk) 13:35, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above writer points this out how racialized this article is. It is very racialized. The first three sentences include these elements:
Karen is a ... white ... woman
...depicting ... white women who "use their white ... privilege
...being racist
The article offers no explanation, evidence or sources to justify this assertion.
Your position appears to be that the un-evidenced and un-sources assertion will stand until the above writer provides evidence that you are wrong. No. That is not how it works. You, and the article generally, must provide explanation, evidence or sources to justify this assertion in the first place. PeterColdridge (talk) 02:09, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These statements all are sourced, I believe? Valereee (talk) 14:51, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Karen Origin

[edit]

I wanted to point out that the term Karen started as a pejorative all the way back in 1998 and has been in use since then. It stemmed from a flame war in an AOL chat forum (yes AOL) that was focused on the tv show Will & Grace and the character "Karen" who was Grace's assistant. While a niche term until around 2005, it gained traction in various forums from the time, especially on Myspace posts. Widespread adaptation didn't take off until 2018 when it became conflated with the "can I speak to your manager" haircut meme, taking on new connotative meaning associated with that meme, rather than its original use as a pejorative, which was: a loud or obnoxious woman, often drunk or inebriated, and with whom there was difficulty in handling. When the two terms conflated, the meaning shifted to an individual who was arrogant, demanding, and unreasonable, often to the extreme. While they were similar, the new meaning eclipsed the prior uses, which is likely why the origin seems to have been lost and prior referential uses lost. FriarMartin (talk) 21:24, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 October 2024

[edit]

Add to Category:Stereotypes of white women 47.152.224.197 (talk) 03:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thebiguglyalien (talk) 04:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SNL use of Karen in SNL skit

[edit]

I've always believed the usage of "Karen" really became big after the SNL skit black jeopardy with Chadwick Boseman (original black panther actor, that sadly died young of colon cancer). In that 2018 SNL skit, "Karen" is a Caucasian woman that's nice and noble for bringing potato salad to share, but it's bland and has raisins, so is oblivious to black culture. The joke being that not just anyone can bring the potato salad. It's like bringing Ambrosia (fruit salad with marshmallows) to a party in the South or Midwest, but not making it pink. Since then the usage of Karen seems to have changed from a white woman that's nice, but oblivious of black culture, to instead someone that's entitled. 108.18.208.58 (talk) 23:36, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A use of "Karen" in a 2009 BBC movie

[edit]

In the BBC film "In the Loop" (2009) one of minor characters is named "Karen" and matches all of the characteristics of "a Karen".

I've read the discussion and there are earlier references but they relate to somewhat questionable sources.

Do people think this is worthy of inclusion in the main article? 124.148.184.36 (talk) 10:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is just something you've noticed yourself while watching the film: no, that would be WP:OR. Wikipedia would need a secondary source to have commented on it. Belbury (talk) 11:39, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]