Jump to content

User talk:Sahaib

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Sahaib3005)

Women in Red November 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red December 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

DYK for James Smart (police officer)

[edit]

On 2 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James Smart (police officer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Chief Constable James Smart flooded police courts with over 17,000 cases to prove how impractical it was for home owners to light their own stairs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James Smart (police officer). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, James Smart (police officer)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a mop reserved in your name

[edit]
You are a remarkable editor in many ways. You would be a good administrator, in my opinion, and appear to be well qualified. You personify an administrator without tools and have gained my support already!

Maliner (talk) 18:39, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sahaib Just received your thanks. You're welcome! waiting for the endorsers to clog your talk page now! Maliner (talk) 18:45, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article rename

[edit]

Hello, you recently moved St Johns Shopping Centre to St John's Shopping Centre, Liverpool. Please can you indicate where the punctuation has come from? It isn't present on official name or branding. The Liverpool variant is the only one, that I can see, using that name styling specifically and therefore, i'd have thought holding the parent title would be sufficient, or at least, an WP:RM would have been advisable. Bungle (talk • contribs) 18:36, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bungle: consistency with the commons category, St John's Shopping Centre, Perth and St John's Market. I have moved it back. Sahaib (talk) 18:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The commons category is also wrong, however this merely picked up the erroneous naming format of the time. The commons cat could/should perhaps just be renamed also. You didn't respond to the WP:RM suggestion, although I am on the fence whether it's worth pursuing, but i'd have thought it perhaps should have been considered initially. Bungle (talk • contribs) 20:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:William Shaw (Illinois politician).jpeg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:William Shaw (Illinois politician).jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. SecretName101 (talk) 18:04, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of McMaster University people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ajax. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Amer Ghalib

[edit]

On 12 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Amer Ghalib, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the city council of Hamtramck, led by Mayor Amer Ghalib, banned the pride flag from publicly owned flagpoles? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Amer Ghalib. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Amer Ghalib), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

1=Launchballer 00:03, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 December 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:William Shaw (Illinois politician).jpeg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:William Shaw (Illinois politician).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lord Garmadon

[edit]

Hello, Sahaib. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lord Garmadon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:36, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons Greetings!

[edit]

Hello there, 'tis the season again, believe it or not, the years pass so quickly now! A big thank you for all of your contributions to Wikipedia in 2024! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2025! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:29, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia:REPORT" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Wikipedia:REPORT to the page Wikipedia:Wikipedia only reports what the sources say has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 19 § Wikipedia:REPORT until a consensus is reached. 67.209.129.48 (talk) 10:51, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 December 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mongolian footballers by populated place has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Mongolian footballers by populated place has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Lost in Quebec (talk) 18:26, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 17:51, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

New page reviewer granted

[edit]

Hi Sahaib, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! – Joe (talk) 10:55, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Nick Begich, Jr." listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Nick Begich, Jr. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 30 § Nick Begich, Jr. until a consensus is reached. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 16:49, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Elders (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of W.R. Weaver Co.

[edit]

Hello Sahaib,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged W.R. Weaver Co. for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want W.R. Weaver Co. to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JJPMaster (she/they) 18:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lip Critic

[edit]

Hello Sahaib,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lip Critic for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Lip Critic to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JJPMaster (she/they) 18:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of WME Awards

[edit]

Hello Sahaib,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged WME Awards for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want WME Awards to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JJPMaster (she/they) 18:50, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prods on academics

[edit]

Hello Sahaib -- I notice that you've prodded a number of academics recently, at least three of which have been contested: Jennifer Hicks very clearly meets WP:PROF via citation profile, and I'd say probably Elena Gutierrez-Farewik and possibly Jakub Szefer too. It's usually best to send academics to Articles for deletion (and tag them with the academics and educators deletion sort) unless Google Scholar shows hardly any evidence of citations; anyone with >1000 citations in total or a single paper with >100 citations really needs a discussion, and in low-citation fields potentially much less than that. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 23:41, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Espresso Addict: it might be best if I avoid reviewing these types of pages but I think the problem with these articles is that all of them cite their own university(s) and when that is one of the only sources, it doesn't really show that they are notable. Sahaib (talk) 06:51, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sahaib&oldid=1267247072"