Draft:Zenith (Rocket Engine)
Submission declined on 22 December 2024 by Pygos (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
- Comment: This is perhaps WP:TOOSOON, see further details on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miranda (engine). Also, the article has not enough sources either to demonstrate notability. You may appeal to this if you have further reasons or put up more reliable secondary sources for this article (see WP:SECONDARY&WP:GNG) Pygos (talk) 04:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Country of origin | United States |
---|---|
Designer | Stoke |
Manufacturer | Stoke |
Associated LV | Nova |
Status | In development |
Liquid-fuel engine | |
Propellant | LOX / CH4 |
Cycle | Full flow staged combustion |
Performance | |
Thrust, sea-level | >444,822 N |
Specific impulse | 345s |
The Zenith is an full-flow staged combustion rocket engine in development by Stoke Space, to be used for the first stage of the Nova rocket. As of December 2024, the engine has been successfully hot-fired on a test stand.[1], but has not yet flown. It aims to be reusable, and Stoke Space plan to first fly it in 2026[2]
See also
[edit]- Raptor – methane-fueled engine developed by SpaceX
- Comparison of orbital rocket engines
References
[edit]- ^ Kuna, Erik (2024-06-11). "Stoke Space Completes First Successful Hotfire Test of Full-Flow, Staged-Combustion Engine". Stoke Space / 100% reusable rockets / USA. Retrieved 2024-12-19.
- ^ Berger, Eric (2024-06-11). "Stoke Space ignites its ambitious main engine for the first time". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2024-12-19.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.