Jump to content

Draft talk:Phil Casey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconTechnology Draft‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
DraftThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconFinance & Investment Draft‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
DraftThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Inappropriate article

[edit]

@लॉस एंजिल्स लेखक moved the article to draft at the same time as I did, perhaps 30 seconds earlier. This article is not even close to appropriate for Wikipedia. This is not facebook or linkedin, it is not a place for self-promotional waffle. That he was supervised by Anderson is irrelevant. That he published in a few high profile journals is irrelevant. Note that the editors who review these articles are as knowledgeable in many cases as those who review papers in PRL/Nature etc. Look at other pages and revise, and maybe he will qualify but I doubt it. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:59, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]