Talk:1552 Broadway/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 20:35, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
[edit]- Did some minor edits. Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 06:28, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Israel Miller linked twice Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 20:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- For costs/prices add equivalent amount after inflation Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 20:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @ArnabSaha, thanks. I have fixed both of these. – Epicgenius (talk) 00:37, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Epicgenius Very sorry, that I was unable to complete the review. Will complete it by today Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 08:08, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Didn't find any other issue. Passing . Notify me if I have made any mistake or left something. Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 15:25, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Epicgenius Very sorry, that I was unable to complete the review. Will complete it by today Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 08:08, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.