Talk:Afşin-Elbistan power stations/GA1

GA Review

Passed. BigChrisKenney (talk) 00:15, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Chidgk1 (talk · contribs) 08:04, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: BigChrisKenney (talk · contribs) 05:21, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Chidgk1: I will be reviewing this article for the January 2025 backlog elimination drive. BigChrisKenney (talk) 05:21, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Initial Assesment

Intro

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Afşin-Elbistan A

Proposed expansion

I made some edits you may wish to review.

History

"In 2004 or 2005, an EIA was done re rehabilitation and FGD."

I'm not sure what this sentence is talking about. Could you clarify it please?

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Technology

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Afşin-Elbistan B

History

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Opposition

I made an edit you may wish to review.

Cancelled power stations

Afşin-Elbistan C

I deleted duplicate information in the second paragraph that was mentioned in the first paragraph.

In the third paragraph, citation 54 needs to be updated.

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Afşin-Elbistan D and E

I made an edit you may wish to review.

Coal

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Mine

Good!

Disease and deaths

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Economics

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Pollution

Added a comma.

Greenhouse gas emissions

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Opposition

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Public opinion

Good!

Sources

I checked roughly every 5th one.

80 - I could not open the link, also, it is missing information such as when it was retrieved.

6 (privacy concerns)

102 (redirect)

Several links are 404.

13, 14, 23, 46, 64, 93

Images

All are in the public domain or under creative commons.

I had to do a lot of editing in this article, but the content is solid. Please review my comments, in particular; Afşin-Elbistan A → History, Cancelled power stations → Afşin-Elbistan C, and source 80. Once you have reviewed my comments and made some changes, I will come back for a final assesment. BigChrisKenney (talk) 06:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@BigChrisKenney Great I like that you have done the edits rather than writing a lot of tiny things here like some reviewers do. Many of them I agree are improvements but there are a few I don’t think are quite right so I will try and explain in edit comments why. However feel free to press your points if my edit comments are wrong or unclear - I won’t be at all offended. Chidgk1 (talk) 16:25, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to clarify history of A plant filters - if still unclear please let me know Chidgk1 (talk) 08:37, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Have reported problem with cite 6 to website owner Chidgk1 (talk) 18:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Duh I should have run the cite archiving much earlier. I ran https://feverfew.toolforge.org/check?wiki=enwiki&page=Af%C5%9Fin-Elbistan_power_stations but all or some of the links it thinks are dead are merely slow. Ran IAbot and it did not find any dead links. Chidgk1 (talk) 10:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@BigChrisKenney Are you happy with my fixes above, and is there anything which is still unclear or needs improvement please? Chidgk1 (talk) 10:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Final Assessment

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (references):

b (citations to reliable sources):

c (OR):

d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):

b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall: Pass/Fail:

I think the changes made are pertinet and useful. Congratulations to GA! BigChrisKenney (talk) 00:11, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.