Talk:An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic

Further reading

For those interested in improving this article: Take a look at the topic "An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic. How to find book reviews?" at David Eppstein's user talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:David_Eppstein&oldid=1267247169 MathKeduor7 (talk) 13:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Graham Priest wrote a textbook about alternative logics?

• Source: https://zbmath.org/?format=complete&q=an:0981.03002

• Reviewed:

Created by MathKeduor7 (talk) and GregariousMadness (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

MathKeduor7 (talk) 08:30, 9 January 2025 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting: - Hook needs work; see comments.

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Article is long enough, new enough, notable enough per WP:BKCRIT criterion 1. Still, I don't find the hook particularly interesting. How about something like

ALT1: ... that the second edition of An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic more than doubled the length of the original text?

(cited in the "Editions" section of the article)?  Ploni^💬  00:10, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi, Ploni. Thank you! Yes, your hook is better than the one I've originally choose. I agree to change it. MathKeduor7 (talk) 00:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Great! In that case looks good to go.  Ploni^💬  02:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)