Talk:Beverly Park, Los Angeles

A fact from Beverly Park, Los Angeles appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 July 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that homes in the Los Angeles neighborhood of Beverly Park average 20,000-30,000 ft², and that the homeowners association requires all dwellings to be larger than 5,000 ft²?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/July.

Wikipedia

Urban studies and planning Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.

THIS PHOTGRPAH OF PRIVATE PROPERTY [sic]

Any picture from a public place of something which is in plane view (you can see it with your eyes) is fair game. So a gate house from a public road is fair to shoot so long as you are on public land (e.g. a city street). My understanding is that plain view means that you cannot use a telephoto lens. However, per the tabloids, I gather you can still blow it up which is why all those celeb pictures look grainy. Mundhenk (talk) 00:34, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't worry about those edits, the complaint was unwarranted and the individual seems to have dropped it (I want to believe after they consulted a lawyer who laughed at the notion). --Bobak (talk) 14:19, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]