Talk:Block settlement

Iceland Low‑importance

	Iceland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iceland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iceland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IcelandWikipedia:WikiProject IcelandTemplate:WikiProject IcelandIceland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Manitoba / British Columbia / Saskatchewan / Alberta / Communities / Saskatchewan communities Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Manitoba.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan communities.

British block settlements?

Chiefly the Okanagan and the Thompson, namelyu Walhachin, British Columbia but also others; Cowichan Valley I think, although that dated from colonial days...not frrom block settlement era stuff like the Brititsh orcharding invasion of the Okanagan or the estabglishment of Walhachin. Is the article's definition exclusive ofr "off the boat" Brits? (most of these were hardly unwashed, though...).Skookum1 (talk) 05:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There were definately British blocs on the prairies. I don't anything about the BC blocs, however. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 15:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

African-American block settlements

Added Breton, Alberta and Wildwood, Alberta to list based on information here: http://blackpioneers.albertasource.ca/communities/index.html The other communities named on the website don't seem to be block settlements. Country Wife (talk) 16:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I changed that section heading, for what I hope are obvious reasons.....Skookum1 (talk) 17:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just noting Happy Valley, British Columbia and Saltspring Island were effectively block settlements, though earlier and unrelated to Sifton's policy and established under Governor Douglas' policies....Skookum1 (talk) 17:31, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hagensborg and others

I didn't place Hagensborg, British Columbia, which was a Norwegian colony, because I'm not sure it was a block settlement; a planned settlement yes but I'm not sure if it was a formal block settlement like the others here. Webster's Corners in Maple Ridge comes to mind, but it was a natural migration of exiles from the breakup of Sointula and not a planned block settlement, th0ugh it was a Finnish concentration of settlement. I'm also unsure of the status of the Hungarians in Prince Rupert and Terrace, if that was a block settlement, likewise the Portuguese in Kitimat, or the Italians of Trail or Revelstoke. In a sense also, places like Walhachin and in fact most of the Okanagan, particularly in the Vernon area, were British block settlements or some of the locations there were; in other cases the policy of granting land to retired British military officers produced effective block settlements, such as in the ranch country around Cache Creek (which includes Walhachin, which was definitely "block" in nature, adn the O'Keefe and Coldstream ranches near Vernon; what is now Pemberton started as a Norwegian block settlement, Agerton.....Skookum1 (talk) 17:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Block settlement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Block settlement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:04, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]