Jump to content

Talk:Carol and Eric Hafner

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 13:19, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Hafner's campaign announcement from prison
Eric Hafner's campaign announcement from prison
Moved to mainspace by GRuban (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 45 past nominations.

GRuban (talk) 16:06, 26 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Interesting subject. Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 (talk) 03:29, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carol "Kitty" Hafner and MOS:NICKNAME

[edit]

@GiantSnowman: and [1] MOS:NICKNAME says "If a person is known by a nickname used in lieu of or in addition to a given name, and it is not a common hypocorism of one of their names, or a professional alias, it is usually presented between double quotation marks following the last given name or initial." This is what she calls herself on her campaign website, https://carolhafner.com/: "Carol “Kitty” Hafner is a Retired NEA Union Member Higher Education Administrator, Former Flight Attendant, and Biotechnology Industry Professional.", the following three paragraphs, as well as the Matt Hickman articles used as a source. I gather you are removing it because Kitty isn't in the article title; but MOS:NICKNAME does not say it has to be the article title, just has to be a nickname she is known as, and this is clearly something she is known as. --GRuban (talk) 17:45, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Either a nickname is so widely used that it should be the article name per COMMONNAME, or it is not, in which case it does not merit mention in the opening sentence. You will note I left the reference to "Kitty" in her section. GiantSnowman 18:12, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see that in MOS:NICKNAME, I think you are reading words that are not present in the text. If it had wanted to say "Either a nickname is so widely used that it should be the article name or it does not merit mention in the opening sentence." it would have said that. --GRuban (talk) 00:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The only person that seems to use 'Kitty' is her own official website and social media. Not a widespread nickname. GiantSnowman 18:19, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that she uses it as her own name is quite important, and should not be minimized. There are cases when we do not allow people to choose how they are to be addressed, but they are very rare. And it is used more than her own official website and social media:
GRuban (talk) 23:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, biographies of political women seem to be a particularly fertile field for bolded nicknames in the first sentence that differ from the article title.

That's seven: most high visibility articles, and multiple Wikipedia:Good articles. With all due respect, Mr. Snowman, I think your interpretation is clearly wrong. --GRuban (talk) 00:41, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. GiantSnowman 18:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have made an edit in an effort to compromise. GiantSnowman 19:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nice, thank you! That is certainly a compromise that we can leave up while we discuss further. I think the place to discuss further is on the talk for MOS:NICKNAME, since it clearly affects many articles, probably a WP:RFC or something. Will ping you when that's written, probably today but maybe tomorrow or so, I'm not the fastest Wikipedian. --GRuban (talk) 20:39, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]