Jump to content

Talk:Columbia Mountains

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

This article has multiple red links that need to be fixed, I don't know much about the article so I can't do it. HairyPerry 16:38, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They don't need to be fixed, they need to be turned into bluelinks by at least making stubs for them; all ranges are listed in BCGNIS as a basic ref and coords; lots of river, mountain, lake, pass lists etc ahve red links; in such cases they're meant to indicate articles that are in need of writing.
I created some of the mountain range articles in July and August. If you don't like the multiple red links or don't know much about the subject, try doing some research on them. If you have success, collect the infomation then write some of the articles, don't complain about it.... Black Tusk (talk) 21:07, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And Lunn Icefield dosn't appear to be an official name according to BCGNIS. Black Tusk (talk) 19:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Native lore

[edit]

There should be something in here about the native name of the mountains and their lore. 217.44.196.242 (talk) 09:55, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]