Talk:Conservative extension

In section Model-theoretic conservative extension: I believe the definition is not the intended at the moment. It should read:

if every model of T_1 can be expanded to a model of T_2 and every model of T_2 restricted to the language of T_1 is a model of T_1.

Otherwise the implication in the next sentence is wrong.

Mattias Ulbrich (talk) 14:29, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Non-conservative

Should the scope of this article be expanded to include discussion of any supertheory? It seems the roots are already there. Tule-hog (talk) 21:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Module for ontologies

I have no idea what this is but here are a few top-links from google seemingly discussing the line in the article:

• [1]
• [2]
• [3]
• [4]

Tule-hog (talk) 22:33, 6 January 2025 (UTC)