Talk:Cycling in China/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 16:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Kusma (talk · contribs) 18:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Adding this to my reviewing queue because I like the topic. Review to follow in a few days. —Kusma (talk) 18:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Content and prose review
[edit]I will comment on anything I notice, but not all of my comments will be strictly related to the GA criteria, so not everything needs to be actioned. Feel free to push back if you think I am asking too much, and please tell me when I am wrong.
- Will comment on lead section later.
- History: might be better to say "the Shanghai Xinbao newspaper" or to drop the definite article.
- Why is the Feiren bicycle more notable that the company producing it? (I found more ads for Feima bikes).
these formed the core of China's domestic bicycle after the war
missing a word ("production"?)- Proliferation: I don't believe the link to cun (unit) is appropriate here; the old unit was obsolete by the time. Also, 24, 26, 28 (Imperial) inches are normal bicycle sizes where I come from, and a modern cun is 1.3 inches, Chinese people are not very tall and I don't believe they ride 31+ inch bicycles.
2 months wages
should it be months'?In reference the proliferation
to the proliferation?- "three rounds" (三转) hm, isn't it more something like the "three things that rotate"?
More later! —Kusma (talk) 22:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC) Reminders to discuss / mention later:
- Recentist China and bike related news: [1] (also has nonzero Google Scholar hits)
- Discuss whether Ji Cheng (cyclist) should be mentioned.
Source spotchecks
[edit]General comments and GA criteria
[edit]Good Article review progress box
|
