Talk:Example-based machine translation

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Translation Studies, a collaborative effort to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Translation Studies. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.Translation studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Translation studiesTemplate:WikiProject Translation studiesTranslation studies
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: CompSci Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --Cindyprcbj (talk) 18:50, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

it does not violate any copyright!

The article text can be found verbatim in the pdf file [1], starting on page 6 of the pdf (which is page one of the article). Nczempin (talk) 18:52, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not a copyvio - it was copied from WP

This article is not, in fact, a copyvio, because the supposed source is headed "SEMINAR REPORT 2009-2011", but the relevant text was already in our article in this version in December 2006. It seems "Jessy K" copied Wikipedia (without acknowledgement), not the other way around. JohnCD (talk) 21:38, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, my mistake, sorry. The pretty unpolished-looking state of this article made me skip checking the obvious case. Nczempin (talk) 23:25, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]