Talk:Fiat G.91Y
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fiat G.91Y article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ground attack, reconnaissance and fighter bomber
[edit]Ground attack, reconnaissance and fighter bomber are three different types of aircraft. Unlikely it was able to fulfill all 3 roles.--Arado (talk) 05:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- It probably could, it all depends what you attach to the hard points. MilborneOne (talk) 16:02, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Of course it did. They were less specialised at that time. The one thing it couldn't do was supersonic dashes, because as a light fighter (and it was still broadly just a twin-engined G.91) it was built around cheap engine(s). Andy Dingley (talk) 20:17, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Italy articles
- Low-importance Italy articles
- All WikiProject Italy pages
- Start-Class Cold War articles
- Low-importance Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- Start-Class aviation articles
- Start-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- C-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- C-Class Italian military history articles
- Italian military history task force articles
- C-Class Cold War articles