This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia
This article STILL reads like an advertisement. I'd like to see some discussion here about some of the controversy surrounding the brand's native american cultural appropriations and the origins of the name "free people" from the commune set of the 60s. Ellyjonez (talk) 09:52, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Each fact in this article is not appropriately cited. A lot of the information used needs citations. There are many facts that do not have a citation as to where they came from. This is a problem because then you cannot tell if its factual or true information posted. There are many things that need to be verified.
The section where it stated Free People was having negative feedback for their festival line all had sources from magazine or news paper articles. All of the links worked and redirected to the specific article. The way the articles wrote about the controversy are very similar to how it was paraphrased in the article however I don't think it was plagiarism.
Hailmaj (talk) 01:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
