This article is within the scope of WikiProject Houston, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HoustonWikipedia:WikiProject HoustonTemplate:WikiProject HoustonHouston
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
WP:GNG states: ""Sources',[2] for notability purposes, should be secondary sources, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability. The number and nature of reliable sources needed varies depending on the depth of coverage and quality of the sources. Multiple sources are generally expected.[3] Sources are not required to be available online, and they are not required to be in English. Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability."
So the fact that it survived a speedy deletion AfD only indicates that it may be notable and should be quickly deleted. Thus, its notability could be challenged again. Second, notability is depend on multiple sources, so given the one "notable" source, this article hasn't met it. --Spshu (talk) 14:26, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I've taken the liberty of adding more sources to the article. Considering the addition of these sources to the article was a fairly easy endeavor, I would certainly recommend giving a quick Google search to determine if what you're expending energy on here is even worthwhile. Basically, if you're truly concerned with notability, then you might do a quick internet search instead rather than reverting edits, putting up notices, discussing on talk pages, etc. Especially when notability has been discussed by several editors in the past. Just my two cents. Cheers. Brian Reading (talk) 08:47, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
