Talk:Kaiserreich (mod)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Notability

Since this mods notability has been discussed in the past, usually ending in it being merged or deleted, I'm making a statement here that I firmly believe that this mod is notable enough for its own article. Since the last discussion regarding this mod on the talk page for the pages long title Talk:Kaiserreich: Legacy of the Weltkrieg, an article from PCGamesN was published about the mod and serving as reception.

Combined with the existing Wargamer and Kotaku articles, which are both incredibly substantial, I believe that this mod now meets general notability guidelines, with significant coverage from several reliable sources, as well as WP:SUSTAINED since the sources range over the span of a few years. And based on the fact I was able to get two reception paragraphs (could easily make it three, plus a small legacy/audience section) and a whole section detailing the mods setting, I think there's clearly a case for this mod to be separate and it doesn't fall under WP:MERGEREASON. λ NegativeMP1 08:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reichspakt map

The map of the Reichspakt is incredibly inaccurate, and I recommend changing it. However, I have not found any images that are not subject to copyright, so I think we should remove it for the time being.Iamindeedahuman (talk) 21:45, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HASC2011 tagging the person who added it for their input on this discussion. Harryhenry1 (talk) 04:51, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]