Jump to content

Talk:Kamala Harris 2024 presidential campaign

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 22 November 2024

[edit]

Under the "Advisers and staff" section, edit this sentence, from:

Philip H. Gordon was national security adviser, Sheila Nix was campaign chief of staff, Quentin Fulks was deputy campaign manager, and former Obama speechwriter Adam Frankel led preparations for Harris's DNC speech.

To:

Philip H. Gordon was national security adviser, Gene Sperling was senior economic adviser, Sheila Nix was campaign chief of staff, Quentin Fulks was deputy campaign manager, and former Obama speechwriter Adam Frankel led preparations for Harris's DNC speech.

Source: https://apnews.com/article/biden-campaign-sperling-gene-pandemic-07a9c4667c02dc9fba3ae09e08401549 Baseballman1876 (talk) 11:15, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Rainsage (talk) 03:23, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Continued fundraising

[edit]

A section should be added on the Harris campaign's continued fundraising, calls for auditing, and debt, as it has resulted in considerable global media coverage:

141.154.49.21 (talk) 18:49, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed Somarain (talk) 20:39, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion 2: Electric Boogaloo

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge (3 in support, none opposed, almost 2 weeks since proposal). JParksT2023 (talk) 22:45, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was a passing thing. Coverage of Freedom Town, USA didn't last until November and I doubt it will suddenly surge again after Harris lost. We can have a sentence in this article on how the Harris campaign tried a PR stunt on Fortnite and how it didn't go well. Bremps... 17:31, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: this doesn't seem notable enough to warrant its own article. The information could easily be merged into the advertising section under its own header, like the Kamala is for they/them is already. JParksT2023 (talk) 18:22, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose It passes WP:SUSTAINED and WP:GNG, and is sufficiently distinct from the campaign itself to merit a page. The article can clearly be expanded. It has strong encyclopedic value in being a microcosm of how the campaign flubbed the attempt to reach younger voters, which ultimately, arguably cost them the election. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 15:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    "It passes WP:SUSTAINED": All the sources from the article are from within a roughly 48 hour time period, so I would not call this WP:SUSTAINED coverage. "The article can clearly be expanded": I don't see how. There are hardly any sources available online beyond two days of its release, and they all have almost all of the same overlapping information. What more information are we missing? Also, in terms of the content "being a microcosm of how the campaign flubbed the attempt to reach younger voters," WP:SYNTH means we cannot make a connection between the map and the loss in the election unless it is actually stated in a source, and considering that there are no sources after the election that I can see (the cause of the citation needed tag for the simple fact of the deletion of the map), we are limited to the information we already have. I see no room for growth beyond what we have now, which would only change with some future coverage, which I just don't see happening. JParksT2023 (talk) 15:53, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    My bad, I mistakenly believed some of the sources were outside of that time range. I don't think this page passes the criteria for a standalone article, so I will change to support the merge instead. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 16:14, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Interesting...

[edit]

Should we include that she would be the first vice president of a former vice president to be elected president? 2601:249:1A80:22E0:8819:78DC:B7FB:6CBA (talk) 18:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]