Talk:Llama.cpp

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 14 May 2024 by reviewer Félix An (talk · contribs).

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

notability

In line with the general notability guidelines and the recommendation in Wikipedia:Multiple_sources that "it seems that challenges to notability are successfully rebuffed when there are three good in-depth references in reliable sources that are independent of each other" I have four sources that are mainly about llama.cpp that explain what the software is and how to use it. Two sources are from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources and one is from an academic journal (with one of the keywords listed in that paper being "llama.cpp"). If anyone disagrees with the notability of this software please describe why you think the sources listed do not show notability. J2UDY7r00CRjH (talk) 23:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Potential sources

Geganov and Slaren wrote an article about GGUF here: [1] I'm not sure if we can use it as it is a primary source. I personally would like to use it as a source for the Vulkan backend which other sources have not yet covered I think. Xuan Son Nguyen is the third author and works for Huggingface, so perhaps we can view him as an editor, which then makes it permissible to use? Might open a discussion on RSN about this.

There is also a great article about GGUF here: [2]

However, it is a bachelor's thesis, which means it probably cannot be used per WP:SCHOLARSHIP. If it gets more citations I think then we could use it. J2UDY7r00CRjH (talk) 21:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I used the hf source after also finding secondary sources for the statement I used it in. Readers will prefer Geganov's article and the secondary sources should remove any issue in using it for that one claim. Geganov's article also lists all the backends in a single article while the other sources each mention only one or two backends. J2UDY7r00CRjH (talk) 03:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More theses:

Cultural Entity Knowledge Graph Builder: Automating Ontological Classification Using Large Language Models p.30

Inference optimization of Large Language Models on RISC-V HPC platforms p.48 J2UDY7r00CRjH (talk) 03:47, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]