Talk:Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
| Archives: 1 |
 | Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
"Belly Blech" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Belly Blech has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 1 § Belly Blech until a consensus is reached. cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
The redirect List of characters in Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 1 § List of characters in Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga until a consensus is reached. cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:51, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Infobox
[edit]Secondary infoboxes are highly nonstandard, and a completely unreferenced infobox is certainly not beneficial either. I am not convinced of the merit behind having the infobox beyond decoration, and the section is small enough that it makes the article look worse. Cukie Gherkin (talk) 03:04, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
GA concerns
[edit]I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are outlined below:
- The "Gameplay" section contains numerous uncited statements.
- The remake on the 3DS has had numerous reviews, but this article is missing a "Critical reception" section for the remake.
Is anyone willing to address the above concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 22:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)