Jump to content

Talk:Melbourne bus route 601

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Source assesment 1

[edit]
Source assessment table prepared by User:NotOrrio
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
No Made by government who runs the route Yes Government website No Timetable No
Yes Users association Yes Users association Yes Main topic is about how the bus route isn't adequate enough and the benefits of the route Yes
Yes News article Yes News article Yes Main topic is the benefits of the bus route Yes
Yes Users association Yes Users association No No mention of the bus route just mentions the problem that resulted in the route's creation No
Yes Major Australian Transit Article Yes Major Australian Transit Article Yes Main topic is about the routes success in that year Yes
Yes News article Yes News article Yes Main topic about the bus route its success and its issues Yes
No The victorian state government runs the route Yes Government website No No mention of the bus route what so ever No
Yes Major Australian Transit Article Yes Major Australian Transit Article No Just a mention No
No Website is owned by the university that bus runs to Yes Government website No Just a mention No
No Made by government who operates the route Yes Government Website No Is a timetable No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Summary-4 sources show full notability based on this it is safe to say the route is notable NotOrrio (talk) 06:35, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Add the follow tag (once published)

[edit]

Between the wikiproject shell and first comment add the following {{oldafdfull|Melbourne bus route 601}} as per the original AFDs of the older versions of the articles NotOrrio (talk) 06:50, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]