Talk:Newton Lower Falls Branch/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Pi.1415926535 (talk · contribs) 06:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Steelkamp (talk · contribs) 04:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Ok, I'll take this review. Steelkamp (talk) 04:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Good article criteria
[edit]Well written
[edit]Lead
- I think Massachusetts should be linked, as there are no sea of blue issues there.
- Done
- 21st-century proposals should be reworded to avoid starting a sentence with a figure.
- Done
Route
- ...in just five minutes. I would change to
...in five minutes
as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch.- Done
Early history
- It had cost $39,050 to build. Recommend changing to
It cost $39,050 to build.
- Done
- What is the "Newton Circuit"?
- Done Added some wikilinks to clarify.
- ...while Lower Falls Branch service was reduced to Riverside–Lower Falls shuttle trains. I think this would be clearer as
...while Lower Falls Branch service was reduced to shuttle trains to Riverside.
- Done I prefer to say "between X and Y" rather than "to X" unless a service is unidirectional.
Electrification
- The single electric railcar... Replace with
A single electric railcar...
because the railcar is not already mentioned.- Done
- State legislature could link to Massachusetts General Court.
- Done
Closure
- Just to be clear, I recommend changing Newton–Framingham route to
Newton–Framingham streetcar route
.- Done
- Service was reduced to 7+1⁄2 round trips at that time. Should that be
Service was reduced to 7+1⁄2 round trips per day at that time.
?- Done
- Change "1950–1951" to "1950–51" for consistency with other dates in the article.
- Done
- It included a deed restriction disallowed the right-of-way from being used as "a transportation, communication, electrical or other corridor or right of way". This should be changed to
It included a deed restriction that disallowed the right-of-way from being used as "a transportation, communication, electrical or other corridor or right of way".
- Done
Rail trail and litigation
- The STB initialism is not defined before being used.
- Done
Verifiable with no original research
[edit]References spotchecked: 12, 30, 34, 37, 59, 67, 68, 71. No issues found.
Broad in its coverage
[edit]Neutral
[edit]Stable
[edit]Illustrated, if possible
[edit]General
[edit]- Do you know why the map link is below the categories? Is that a glitch?
- The "KML file" link created by {{Attached KML}}? That appears normally to me on both desktop Chrome and mobile Firefox. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, the KML link. For me, its below the categories at the bottom of the page on desktop Chrome and Firefox and mobile Safari. Steelkamp (talk) 02:14, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- The "KML file" link created by {{Attached KML}}? That appears normally to me on both desktop Chrome and mobile Firefox. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Regardless of the above map glitch, I'm going to pass this review. Congratulations :) Steelkamp (talk) 02:14, 29 June 2024 (UTC)