Talk:Pleasley Colliery

Derbyshire Mid‑importance

The article on Pleasley Colliery is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	At least one photograph is included in this article

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mining Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Stefanthatch (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
Stefanthatch2 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Scheduled Ancient Monument

Can we get a source for verification of this claim? /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 23:33, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

English Heritage: National Monuments Record number = SK 46 SE 31 / Stefanthatch (talk) 19:01, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant article

mice structure, tone and pic.With an ibox and inline refs this could be a "Good Article" Well done Victuallers (talk) 07:55, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image changes & additional section

The new image added at the introduction to the article does give a better visual perspective, but the image of the South headstock is not in an appropriate location since it is not relevant to the body of the article and shows the results of 2010-2011 restoration work. A post 1995 timeline addition is proposed which will include conservation and/or remediation work undertaken during since that time and can elaborate on the preserved structures such as this. (Technical Historian, Pleasley Colliery) Stefanthatch (talk) 14:10, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you don't mind update

Hope you don't mind me adding an update but it seemed a pity not to make a reference to all the restoration work that has been done recently Carllrac (talk) 15:41, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Source of "Sputnik" claims?

Just wondering if there was any citation for that? Only think I can find is http://www.pleasleypittrust.org.uk/#!services/c187h - which looks like they've just copied it verbatim.

Edent (talk) 11:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest editing

I came here intending to add a period hard reference into the prose, but found the content was not easily conducive to incorporation. Per the section above where Stefanthatch has self-identified as a connected user, I have banner-tagged this article with conflict of interest and also excessive detail. I also found another self-declaration here, after confirming the name from File:Pleasley 010208.jpg

Also, Stefanthatch appears to have a near-duplicate username, Stefanthatch2, when Wikipedia normally allows only one. Neither username has declarations to the other.

For the purpose of top-templating this Talk page, I will assume they are the same individual;
Stefanthatch (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and
Stefanthatch2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Noted, when the majority of content was added, Wikipedia had lesser standards than today.

When accessing their website, I found (supposedly visitor) reviews from an Alan Keegan, whereas an Alankeegan has contributed to this article, and a name which appears in the 2012 newspaper source I intended to add, identified as a volunteer. Per WP:INTEGRITY, I shall not try to add this source.

Patrollers - it will be a couple of hours before I can finish by top-tagging this talk.-- 82.13.47.210 (talk) 21:55, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--82.13.47.210 (talk) 23:51, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]