Talk:Prashna Upanishad
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Prashna Upanishad article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Formatting
[edit]This article lacks proper formatting can anybody help? Lokesh 2000 12:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
@Deadshot888 edits
[edit]@Deadshot888: Why are you deleting sources, as you did here, here and here? Please see wikipedia policies and guidelines. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 19:40, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Ms Sarah Welch: : Everything shared is wrong. Moreover the sanskrit translation is wrong, i have read them a long back, taught me by a guru plus i am from country who's heritage is you talking about, so from my knowledge the corrections i made was legit, western-scholars mis-understood everything, this wrong info guides countless of people to opposite direction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deadshot888 (talk • contribs) 19:57, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Deadshot888: You are free to believe in whatever you want, but wikipedia is not your blog, see WP:WWIN. We rely on published sources. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 20:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Ms Sarah Welch:: since not my blog so you decide to spread wrong stuff related to my own heritage to my own people ? lol ? ATLEAST correct the sanskrit translations the stuff is wrong, look at the language they use, "belief" , "embellished". it is false. Everything shared over there is "misunderstood" form of my own people's study. oh yea on the blog i thought wikipedia is platform for all ? no ? alright but for good's sake, at-least research on what is written oh wait how can you research, you guys believe in western-scholars, not being offensive but the stuff they share is wrong, i don't know it is "on-purpose" or they are really stupid. :) Take care. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deadshot888 (talk • contribs)
Categories:
- B-Class Hinduism articles
- High-importance Hinduism articles
- B-Class Hindu philosophy articles
- High-importance Hindu philosophy articles
- B-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- B-Class India articles of Low-importance
- B-Class Indian literature articles
- Low-importance Indian literature articles
- B-Class Indian literature articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Indian literature articles
- WikiProject India articles
- B-Class Philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Philosophy articles
- B-Class philosophical literature articles
- Mid-importance philosophical literature articles
- Philosophical literature task force articles
- B-Class philosophy of religion articles
- Mid-importance philosophy of religion articles
- Philosophy of religion task force articles
- B-Class Eastern philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Eastern philosophy articles
- Eastern philosophy task force articles
- B-Class Ancient philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Ancient philosophy articles
- Ancient philosophy task force articles