Talk:Regi (Pokémon)

Regi (Pokémon) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 4, 2025. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Regi (Pokémon) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Regi" Pokémon – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Pokémon Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Video games: Nintendo / Characters Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.

This article is supported by the Video game characters task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Sextet category

This article is about a group of six. But it's generally known it to be a quintet (formerly a trio). But I guess that's just a fandom convention, not anything official I guess. Web-julio (talk) 04:42, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given this discusses a group of six, and not just the five other Regi standalone, I'd argue sextet is more fitting. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 12:58, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regi or Regis

This may be a stupid question, but is the plural of Regi not Regis? -- MystiiFlareon2 (talk) 09:53, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've always heard "Regis". Landfish7 (talk) 01:07, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MystiiFlareon2 wanted to run through the sources before I responded. While the sources cited use a mix of "Regi," "Regis," "Legendary Titans," and "Legendary Giants," it seems the sources predominantly use "Regis" when referring to them as a group, though usage is not 100%. They seem to use Regi when referring to a singular member or when referring to them in isolation, so the title should be fine, but I'll change the text contents to plurals to match the sources. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 01:18, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. Arconning (talk) 09:42, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Regi (Pokémon)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 17:58, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 06:50, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shall review in a few days^ Arconning (talk) 06:50, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pokelego999 Here you go! Hope these short comments can be addressed. Arconning (talk) 16:30, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prose and MoS

Make all date formats used in the article and the references stick to one format (ex: dmy, 00-00-0000, ymd) rather than using multiple for consistency.
- Pokelego999, this hasn't been done. ^

Lead and infobox

No issues.

Conception and design

No issues, honestly good writing!

Appearances

re-appearances, remove hyphen.
re-awaken, also remove the hyphen.
- Side-note: If you're using the hyphens to emphasize clarity in reading words with the prefix re-, it's perfectly acceptable to not change these at all but I'd push through with removing them. ^

Reception

-such as the Baghdad Battery and dragons-, these should be endashes instead of hyphens.
given a short end of the stick, was this used in the article? If it was use commas, if not probably use something more formal.
"regirocktok,", "Regitube," , put comma outside.

Media

All images have proper captions, licenses, and are relevant to the article.

Refs

I'd recommend a translation on the foreign language titles.
Earwig just picks up quotes, all good.
Random ref check: 1, 10, 18, 28, 36, 44. All good.

Misc

No ongoing edit war, neutral, broad enough information about the topic.

- @Arconning: Addressed all issues. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 17:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Arconning good catch. Dates should be patched up now. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 03:22, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.