Jump to content

Talk:Scranton, Pennsylvania

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Scranton, Pennsylvania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:14, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed entry: Robert J. Hanlon

[edit]

Disputed entry:

IMO Scranton must be proud that one of its ordinary citizens was immortalized on par with Occam's razor. His name reaches way beyond Scranton; in fact known globally in many books, hence he must be listed among notable citizens. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:58, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Just as the many members of Fleetwood Mac are not all notable simply by their membership in that notable group, simply being mentioned as the originator of a notable idea does not make an individual notable. See WP:INHERIT. If a showing can be made of meeting WP:ANYBIO or WP:NPROF for the guy, best practice would be to write the bio first. John from Idegon (talk) 22:03, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • You are confusing WP:N for standalone articles with criteria of inclusion into an article. Best example to illustrate you the difference: a mayor of a small village surely to be mentioned in the article about this village, but quite surely we never write a standalone article about the mayor. So yes, the members of Fleetwood Mac are notable in their hometowns. Staszek Lem (talk) 01:29, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • No, I'm not. We just had a discussion over at the school project about this. Yes, content in articles can be limited to notable subjects only. This applies especially to embedded lists. John from Idegon (talk) 01:39, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
        • Yes you are. this article is not about school, so school project consensus is irrelevant, not say that the discussion does not conclude what you say. can be limited to notable - show me the guideline. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:35, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
            • WP:LISTBIO. Also, you provided no sources for his tie to the community. I understand your frustration, I believe. It's annoying to me also that anybody that carried a football or laid down a mixtape can have a bio, but for people who actually think, you gotta jump through hoops to get one. However, that's a side issue here. Honestly, I doubt you can make an argument that will sway me, so it may be time to request a WP:3O. If the third opinion agrees with you, I'll concede consensus as long as you source the tie to the community. John from Idegon (talk) 17:13, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
              Sorry, I perused WP:LISTBIO and WP:SOURCELIST, and honestly fail to see where the say that listed persons must be "blue links" (or "blue-linkable"). I do not really care about this Hanlon guy, but I'd like to clarify the issue, because it is generic. Please cite the the sentence you have in mind. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:15, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
              BTW, LISTBIO has a dubious clause the entries must have the same importance to the subject as would be required for the entry to be included in the text. By this clause "Joel Wachs (born 1939) — Los Angeles City Council member" has zero importance to the subject of Scranton, Pennsylvania. Similarly, Polish singe Czeslaw Niemen was born in a small village in Belarus which he gave a shit about, but he is listed there, and so on. I have an idea on the improvement of LISTBIO and going to make a suggestion in its talk page. If you are interested, I may ping you when I do this. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:15, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Population

[edit]

I'm confused how 6,760,089 was chosen as the population count for the city and county seat section. That accounts for about half of Pennsylvania's population, but only 200,000 people actually live in Lackawanna County. What's going on? LittleCuteSuit (talk) 02:51, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scrantons Welsh heritage

[edit]

It was being discussed on Twitter that there is no mention of the Welsh heritage of Scranton on the Wikipedia page (unlike the Irish). Despite a fairly significant contribution. So I thought I'd add a couple of lines. They were promptly deleted. Any reason why? It was only factual information added. Thanks Dunadan9 (talk) 22:27, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dunadan9: I removed most of your edit again. Personal genealogy websites are not reliable sources. You also added content which was not supported by the source cited. Magnolia677 (talk) 08:29, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Businesses Located in Scranton

[edit]

Can someone please add a section on the businesses HQ’d in or shipping from Scranton. Annyaka (talk) 03:55, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Scranton,_Pennsylvania&oldid=1268398989"