Talk:Shiny Pokémon/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 04:30, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: DoctorWhoFan91 (talk · contribs) 08:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
I'll take this one. Might take a few days for my initial remarks. Also, would you like to review Doctor Who series 13? DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 08:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
I'll review reception later in 10-12 hours. Also, I made some minor edits myself.
Lead
[edit]all fine
History and appearances
[edit]- lowered to a 1 in 4096 chance: that's an increase, not lowering?
- The term "Shiny" was originally used by fans and later adopted as an official name.: when did these happen? give year or decade
- Designer James Turner stated: has any other designer stated anything else?
Changes
[edit]- can you give how much the odds change for the examples which don't say it, if possible?
- what's overworld?
Spin-offs
[edit]- How do "Shining Pokemon" cards differ from normal cards?
- without a "full art" display? what does this mean?
- Radiant Pokémon were later introduced, and functioned similarly to Shining Pokémon.: again, how are these different
References and Images
[edit]- There is a TheGamer ref which is not wikilinked.
- Other references, and the image, is fine
Overall
[edit]@Pokelego999: will review reception later. I only saw these minor issues in the rest of the article. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 17:46, 7 January 2025 (UTC)