Talk:Siouan languages

Languages Mid‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of North America Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Book for inclusion in bibliography

The following recent Open Access book could be included under bibliography. I have a conflict of interest, so I post this on the talk page.

Catherine Rudin & Gordon, James Bryan (eds.) 2016. Advances in the study of Siouan languages and linguistics (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 10). Berlin: Language Science Press. http://langsci-press.org//catalog/book/94 ISBN: 978-3-946234-37-1 doi: 10.17169/langsci.b94.118 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasy jatere (talk • contribs) 13:33, 30 May 2016‎

Done. That's quite a goodie, I've added it now to the article. Thanks! Uanfala (talk) 21:40, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Siouan languages. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051025082050/http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/siouan.html to http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/siouan.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Siouan > Dakotan

given the historical origins of the word 'Sioux' as an exonym based in anishinaabe & french antagonism towards Dakota people, and
given the best practice of using a culture's own words to describe themselves (endonyms, autonyms), eg, Dakota/Lakota/Nakota instead of 'Sioux',
- shouldn't we be changing the name of this language family from 'Siouan' to 'Dakotan' ?
- and the 'Sioux' article to 'Dakota' ?

~ tpk (talk) 10:26, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who speaks it and what are the sublanguages?

I came here from "Hidatsa language" hoping to learn more about linguistically related tribes within this language family. This seems like a very pertinent piece of info.

I apologize if this is not the place to write a request/critique. I am not yet familiar with the system yet. Long-time lurker, first-time user.

I am also happy to help create/manage this request, if needed. But if I knew the information we wouldn't be here.

Thanks!

DumbleGore (talk) 06:39, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rankin et al. (n.d.)

Rankin, Robert L.; Carter, Richard T.; Jones, A. Wesley (1998). "Proto-Siouan Phonology and Grammar". In Li, Xingzhong; Lopez, Luis; Stroik, Tom (eds.). Papers from the 1997 Mid-America Linguistics Conference. Columbia: University of Missouri-Columbia. pp. 366–375.

This is one of the references on https://csd.clld.org/. Might this be published version of Rankin, Robert L., Carter, Richard T. & Jones, A. Wesley (n.d.). Proto-Siouan Phonology and Grammar. Ms. University of Kansas.? Snowman304|talk 22:20, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To add to article

Could we add where the Siouan languages (or proto-Siouan) is believed to have originated? 76.189.135.48 (talk) 21:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This text is in the Western Siouan languages article, but, perplexingly (and unhelpfully), not in this article:

Linguistic and historical records indicate a possible southern origin of the Siouan people, with migrations over a thousand years ago from North Carolina and Virginia to Ohio. Some continued down the Ohio River, to the Mississippi and up to the Missouri. Others went down the Mississippi, settling in what is now Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana. Others traveled across Ohio to what is now Illinois, Wisconsin, and Minnesota, home of the Dakota. 76.189.135.48 (talk) 21:52, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While I'm less familiar with this regarding language development, many Dakota people dispute archeological constructions that attribute their origins to the East. Dakota scholar Waziyatawin articulates this in her book What Does Justice Look Like?. You can see a few snippets of this conversation via Google Books and a bit of it in the summary portion of my draft.

Since the claim is controversial, it may have been removed for that reason. Regardless, if it was added again, it would have to discuss that scholars disagree. Pingnova (talk) 22:17, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]