Talk:WestlawNext

This article has sufficient overlap with Westlaw to be merged. And it doesn't seem to have potential for expanding much beyond its current state as a standalone article. Xtzou (talk) 22:14, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why this shouldn't be merged. Most of this was already in the Westlaw article. However, unlike West, Wiki apparently doesn't have a one good place rule, or nearly any other. Busjack (talk) 19:45, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think two separate articles with parallel content is condoned. Don't know exactly what "guideline" that falls under. Xtzou (Talk) 19:56, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]