The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: One of two follow-ups to my expansion campaign for fellow DYK stalwart The Book of Virtues, the other being The Moral Compass. My final candidate in this arena before Milton's impact where I live; wish me safety, take care, and I'll see you back. (With special thanks to this selection's AFC approver, Sir MemeGod (talk·contribs)Bkissin (talk·contribs).)
Moved to mainspace by Slgrandson (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 14 past nominations.
I was wondering why I got pinged to a random DYK, now I know! :D SirMemeGod 12:20, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
@Sir MemeGod: Sorry, I mixed up my reviewers days ago; see above for correction. (You actually approved Children's, while Bkissin approved Compass.) --Slgrandson (How's myegg-throwing coleslaw?) 20:24, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Is somebody working to review this DYK? If not, I would do so. @Sir MemeGod:@Bkissin:@Slgrandson:Pardon the pinging. ProfGray (talk) 14:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Overall: New enough and long enough. Earwig gives 9.3% chance, but the only results showing are the title. Hook fact is cited to the New York Times, which confirms it (accessed via ProQuest). Looks good to go! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
New enough and long enough. Earwig gives 9.3% chance, but the only results showing are the title. Hook fact is cited to the New York Times, which confirms it (accessed via ProQuest). Looks good to go! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)