Trigonometric moment problem
In mathematics, the trigonometric moment problem is formulated as follows: given a sequence , does there exist a distribution function on the interval such that:[1][2] with for . In other words, an affirmative answer to the problems means that are the Fourier-Stieltjes coefficients for some measure on .[3][4]
In case the sequence is finite, i.e., , it is referred to as the truncated trigonometric moment problem.[5]
Characterization
[edit]The trigonometric moment problem is solvable, that is, is a sequence of Fourier coefficients, if and only if the (n + 1) × (n + 1) Hermitian Toeplitz matrix with for , is positive semi-definite.[6]
The "only if" part of the claims can be verified by a direct calculation. We sketch an argument for the converse. The positive semidefinite matrix defines a sesquilinear product on , resulting in a Hilbert space of dimensional at most n + 1. The Toeplitz structure of means that a "truncated" shift is a partial isometry on . More specifically, let be the standard basis of . Let and be subspaces generated by the equivalence classes respectively . Define an operator by Since can be extended to a partial isometry acting on all of . Take a minimal unitary extension of , on a possibly larger space (this always exists). According to the spectral theorem,[7] there exists a Borel measure on the unit circle such that for all integer k For , the left hand side is As such, there is a -atomic measure on , with (i.e. the set is finite), such that[8] which is equivalent to
for some suitable measure .
Parametrization of solutions
[edit]The above discussion shows that the trigonometric moment problem has infinitely many solutions if the Toeplitz matrix is invertible. In that case, the solutions to the problem are in bijective correspondence with minimal unitary extensions of the partial isometry .
See also
[edit]- Bochner's theorem
- Hamburger moment problem
- Moment problem
- Orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle
- Spectral measure
- Schur class
- Szegő limit theorems
- Wiener's lemma
Notes
[edit]- ^ Geronimus 1946.
- ^ Akhiezer 1965, pp. 180–181.
- ^ Edwards 1982, pp. 72–73.
- ^ Zygmund 2002, p. 11.
- ^ Schmüdgen 2017, p. 257.
- ^ Schmüdgen 2017, p. 260.
- ^ Simon 2005, pp. 26, 42.
- ^ Schmüdgen 2017, p. 261.
References
[edit]- Akhiezer, N. I. (1965). The Classical Moment Problem and Some Related Questions in Analysis. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. doi:10.1137/1.9781611976397. ISBN 978-1-61197-638-0.
- Akhiezer, N.I.; Kreĭn, M.G. (1962). Some Questions in the Theory of Moments. Translations of mathematical monographs. American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0-8218-1552-6.
- Edwards, R. E. (1982). Fourier Series. Vol. 85. New York, NY: Springer New York. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8156-3. ISBN 978-1-4613-8158-7.
- Geronimus, J. (1946). "On the Trigonometric Moment Problem". Annals of Mathematics. 47 (4): 742–761. doi:10.2307/1969232. ISSN 0003-486X. JSTOR 1969232.
- Schmüdgen, Konrad (2017). The Moment Problem. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 277. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64546-9. ISBN 978-3-319-64545-2. ISSN 0072-5285.
- Simon, Barry (2005). Orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle. Part 1. Classical theory. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. Vol. 54. Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0-8218-3446-6. MR 2105088.
- Zygmund, A. (2002). Trigonometric Series (third ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-89053-5.