User talk:00101984hjw

Welcome!

Hello, 00101984hjw!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Hajoon0102 💬 04:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LeeEHwa.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LeeEHwa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Petition to the Blue House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jobs. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to National Petition to the Blue House, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 01:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author ref formatting

Hello, I undid this edit and wanted to share rationale.

It's a little tricky; I arrived at this formatting intentionally after a long time of thinking. Part of the problem is we don't know how authors romanize their own names, and rather than searching for that info or assuming a romanization that they don't prefer, I think leaving their Hangul names as is is safer and quicker. Furthermore, I think the parameters should correspond to the literal names. In other words, 김현정's given name is not "Hyeon-jeong (김현정)", it's just "현정" (or maybe "Hyeon-jeong", we don't know unless we research that person). 104.232.119.107 (talk) 00:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I thought it would generally be helpful to provide a RR romanization of the names of each author per WP:NCKO. Does MOS:KO have any rules for Korean names in reference? 00101984hjw (talk) 01:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Complicated; I agree that it's potentially helpful to have Latin text names, as not everyone can type Korean and sometimes people need to reference author surnames, but then we have the |first=Hyeon-jeong (김현정) issue.

There may be an argument to romanize to RR per WP:NCKO, but I'd still prefer to exclude the Korean text if we do that. But again, we'd run into the "what if authors have preferred spellings" problem again. It's so much work to look up every author to see if/how they romanize their names in some way.

Unfortunately MOS:KO doesn't provide guidance on it; honestly it doesn't provide guidance on much.

But this is just my opinion; I think there's positives and negatives to each option.

Key thing is I think we should propose changes to WP:NCKO and MOS:KO, both on this issue and others. Both style guides are too loose and confusing. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 02:35, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. MOS:KO absolutely needs an update. Current guidelines are ambiguous and has little coverage over many potential issues. The current state of the Goguryeo article would be a good example. 00101984hjw (talk) 03:04, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

thank you for your contributions!! :) xRozuRozu (t • c) 20:56, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1954 Busan Yongdusan fire

On 6 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1954 Busan Yongdusan fire, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 30 royal portraits of Korean kings were completely destroyed in a 1954 fire in Busan, South Korea? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1954 Busan Yongdusan fire. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1954 Busan Yongdusan fire), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:02, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ddotty has been accepted

Ddotty, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 03:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yangban

This important article is in really rough shape, if you're interested in an article that needs improving seefooddiet (talk) 17:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll take a look at it when I have time. Thanks. — 00101984hjw (talk) 20:08, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Presbyterian Church of Korea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bible studies.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Hello @00101984hjw, I found your profile via the cleanup project. I wrote a page by being as neutral and factual as possible (including listing criticisms and legal proceedings). Could you give me some feedback about : Doctrine (startup) ? Thanks ! Condottiero dei tempi moderni (talk) 17:46, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Before you make any further edits, please read the guidelines on WP:COI and follow the instructions on WP:COIPAYDISCLOSE. Wikipedia has strict editing guidelines on paid editing.

The article itself looks fine: sources seem to be reliable (Les Echos (France)) and plentiful enough to pass WP:ORG. The fact that most of its sources are in French shouldn't matter per WP:RSUEC. Just make sure you're following paid editing guidelines. -- 00101984hjw (talk) 22:48, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @00101984hjw, thank you for this precious feedback. Indeed after reading, I understand that if I have declared my COI on my profile page, on the talk page, if I have remained neutral and concise, I didn't know that it was necessary to go through a specific process: Articles for creation.

Can I submit the article even if it's already published? By adding: "{subst:submit}"? or "{edit COI}" ?

I'm new to the EN Wikipedia, the rules vary from one language edition to another. I sincerely thank you for your help,

Have a nice day, Condottiero dei tempi moderni (talk) 11:34, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The AfC process is only required for editors who haven’t been verified yet. Since your article is already published there’s no need to go through an AfC. If you’d still like to, you can move the page to draftspace and then submit it using {subst:submit}. — 00101984hjw (talk) 16:12, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Thanks for this answer, I think I'll leave the page as is. So, how can I get the banner removed? I think I'm respecting the rules of the "COI" and neutrality. If there is a need to go through a specific procedure or make changes, that's no problem. Thanks again. Condottiero dei tempi moderni (talk) 16:31, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As agreed with @Axad12, I have moved the page back to draft so that it can go through the planned process of the AFC. Condottiero dei tempi moderni (talk) 14:14, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot WP:COI demands all COI articles to go through an AfC process. Sorry about that. It usually takes a while for drafts to be reviewed by an AfC reviewer, but it'll be reviewed eventually. Thanks again for complying with Wikipedia's guidelines. -- 00101984hjw (talk) 04:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]