User talk:174.216.156.175

July 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Sound of Freedom (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fred Zepelin (talk) 22:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Fred, you seem committed to sending my talk page comments down the memory hole.

Restoring these destructive edits of yours is not an "unconstructive edit", it's the reverse.

Can you explain why removing other people's comments that you don't like isn't the very definition of an "unconstructive edit" 174.216.156.175 (talk) 22:45, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need to learn how Wikipedia works. You're very confused. Fred Zepelin (talk) 00:57, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm absolutely positive that trying to "disappear" talk page comment you disagree with, is 100% not the way Wikipedia works.

Or at least not the way it's suppose to work. What you did was not conductive to discussion and could easily be seen as vandalism. 174.216.156.175 (talk) 01:14, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this is what I mean. You don't even understand that I was the one who restored all of the discussion on the talk page after some anonymous IP editor deleted it. Sit this one out, bud. Fred Zepelin (talk) 02:05, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They were originally deleted by a logged-out user, which could very well be you because when I restored my prior comments you immediately reverted the change without comment, notice, or later apology or explanation.

Then you attempted to report me. And you still continue engaging with me with your snotty condescending attitude. 174.216.156.175 (talk) 13:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So now you're accusing me of being logged out when I deleted your comments, logging back in, and restoring the deleted comments that I had deleted myself? Sounds like a conspiracy! Fred Zepelin (talk) 20:39, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, good lord. I just noticed this gem. You said "I think I can play the wokepedia sources game and make a bold edit" - have no fear, I'm definitely done engaging with you. Enjoy your future editing. Fred Zepelin (talk) 20:41, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.