User talk:67.53.214.86

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your host, rrcs-67-53-214-86.west.biz.rr.com (67.53.214.86), is registered to Spectrum Business and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (67.53.214.86) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 23:01, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello! I noticed that you've been adding a lot of content to articles with odd edit summaries that don't match their edits. Just as an example, in your most recent edit you deleted a whole paragraph and moved some content around all with the summary "Added wikilink." From now on, can you please try to use edit summaries that accurately reflect your edits? Thanks in advance. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 23:03, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You continue to use edit summaries that don't reflect the changes you're making. For instance, in this edit you added a sentence to George Papadopoulos, plus a supporting reference. However your edit summary was just "Added reference." A more appropriate and less misleading edit summary might be something like "Added sentence about fiancee, plus supporting reference." In contrast, here in an example of an edit that you appropriately summarized as "Added reference." --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 18:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Greehey has been accepted

William Greehey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MadeYourReadThis (talk) 20:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Irene Pietsch (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vincent60030 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

still lacking notability in terms of her career as an author.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Irene Pietsch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Irene Pietsch, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

VKZY^LUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 05:23, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 67.53.214.86, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! VKZY^LUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 05:23, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Lyudmila Putina.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 11:02, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Post Bank (Russia) has been accepted

Post Bank (Russia), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Post Bank Russia has been accepted

Post Bank Russia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Home Lander (talk) 01:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Russia Post Bank has been accepted

Russia Post Bank, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dan arndt (talk) 03:06, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Russian Post Bank has been accepted

Russian Post Bank, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dan arndt (talk) 03:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pochta Bank has been accepted

Pochta Bank, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello 67.53.214.86, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to VTB Bank have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2018

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as List of people sanctioned during the Ukrainian crisis. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:30, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalininets has been accepted

Kalininets, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 20:00, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalashnikov USA has been accepted

Kalashnikov USA, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:10, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please add a logo to Kalashnikov USA

Please see WP:Logo for how to add a logo.

Upload it using the "Upload file" link shown right now on the left side of your screen, a few inches below the Wikipedia globe emblem.
The logo *must* be no larger than 300x300px and not high-resolution for copyright reasons.
You have to have the logo on your computer, you can't upload it directly from a web link
When you go into the upload form, do not select "Own work" (you did not make up the logo), but choose "copyright item, logo, for use only on this one page, etc." Just choose the logical items for each button/entry, and then it'll upload it and give you the code.

Hope this helps! MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:12, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

False claims regarding sanctions on VTB bank

Please can you respond to talk page and explain why you interpret the citations you used as supporting the claims you added to the VTB_Bank#History section for "29 July 2014" and "22 December 2015". I would also appreciate if you could indicate if you are making these changes as part of your employment or if it is done in your personal capacity. Soh.Miero (talk) 00:49, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did not say the sources are not reliable, they just do not support the text you added to the wiki. It's like citing NASA in a claim that the earth is flat, sure, NASA is a reliable source, but they do not claim the earth is flat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soh.Miero (talk • contribs) 01:49, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can we try and keep the discussion on the Talk:VTB_Bank#False_claims_regarding_sanctions page, I gave a detailed explanation which is more than fair as to why the assertions are wrong and why your citations are irrelevant. Thanks. Soh.Miero (talk) 02:28, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it is a reliable source from the United States government.67.53.214.86 (talk) 01:46, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated references for 29 July 2014 and 22 December 2015 by removing three references for lack of support. The other references fully support the statements.
The writeup for the Swiss entry has been clarified. I fully agree with the addition of the Swiss list of sanctions. On several different days, I have searched the Swiss law for the list, but have not found the correct list. However, for now, these are the best references that I have found. Of course, I could add RT articles, but the RT articles are not specific about which companies are sanctioned.
I corrected the url for the EU sanctions on 31 July 2014. This reference clearly states VTB Bank.
- Thank you for your discussion.67.53.214.86 (talk) 03:36, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@67.53.214.86: Last I checked your references are still inaccurate even though your claims are now more accurate. I was trying to fix the references when I got blocked from wikipedia and I still have only been partially unblocked after spending hours to correct it and really have just run down my energy to work on this. It would be good to fix the references but I'm no longer going to work on this. --Soh.Miero (talk) 17:56, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bill Greehey (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bill Greehey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bill Greehey, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:35, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hal Rossow (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Davisonio was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hal Rossow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hal Rossow, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Craig Davison (talk) 17:40, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dmitry Lebedev has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dmitry Lebedev. Thanks! SeraphWiki (talk) 02:50, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Igor Shevchenko (lawyer) has been accepted

Igor Shevchenko (lawyer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 14:13, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Michael R. Caputo and See also section

Michael R. Caputo was a Kremlin paid media consultant to Yeltsin and Putin from the mid 1990s to late 2000: the same timeframe that Mikhail Lesin was consolidating the Russian media under the Kremlin's control.

So what are you saying, there is a connection, you believe there must be? Without a source it's purely a POV to draw a connection between them. See also can be easily abused that way, implying things otherwise unsourced. Also, see also isn't a random list of people someone might have known, there need be a strong and compelling reason to link. -- GreenC 05:36, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dmitry Lebedev (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Dmitri_Lebedev_(businessman) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dmitry Lebedev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dmitry Lebedev, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 11:34, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material requires attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to List of people sanctioned during the Ukrainian crisis you included material from this document. That's okay, since the Council of the European Union allows reproduction of their documents, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:41, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikolai Shamalov has been accepted

Nikolai Shamalov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

» Shadowowl | talk 09:43, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Anthony Kennedy into Deutsche Bank. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:45, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am the sole author of the prose that was copied.

Also, the passage had been deleted from wikipedia.

The material on the Anthony Kennedy page had been deleted because the passage was more to do with relationship among persons at Deutsche Bank (Justin Kennedy, who is Anthony Kennedy's son, and others) and Deutsche Bank's unusual relationships with Donald Trump. I had written the passage, but it had been removed from Anthony Kennedy's page by SunCrow because "remove ridiculous footnote that has to do with Donald Trump and has nothing to do with Anthony Kennedy". I could not deny what SunCrow stated. The passage was more appropriate somewhere else.

You are very correct for this user to state that the passage had come from a previous article. However, the passage had been deleted from the article.

I'll state a more appropriate remark in future edits so that the location of the original passage will be included, even if the passage has been deleted.

Thank you for giving me the useful recommendations. I'll be more specific in the remarks. 67.53.214.86 (talk) 22:10, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. X1\ (talk) 00:59, 14 November 2019 (UTC) ... and Thank you some more. X1\ (talk) 01:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. only (talk) 01:48, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

See admission of sock or meatpuppetry at [1]. only (talk) 01:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Alina Kabaeva. Thank you. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 15:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tulsi Gabbard. Stop violating WP:SYNTH by connecting various sources in a novel manner. Your first indication of such a violation would be that the topic of the article is not mentioned at all in the source. Binksternet (talk) 23:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Rise Up (Parachute Club song) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Rise Up (Parachute Club song) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNwuB76pBcc, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16yRIFwvnUQ) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:10, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

May 2021

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Robert Moore. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:22, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Your edit to Kroll Inc. has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:10, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The eXile / FIMACO

Feel free to chip in at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#The eXile. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:05, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Alger Hiss—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Cassiopeia talk 04:58, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is 67.53.214.86 and WP:BLP. Thank you. Jayjg ^(talk) 18:51, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jayjg ^(talk) 20:18, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Blocked again

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for use of inappropriate sources in biographies of living persons and not responding to warnings or attempts to communicate. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jayron 32 12:53, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Frankly, I am pretty fed up with your changes in Martin Schlaff. It took me nearly ten hours of analyzing the changes and doing additional research until I found out that your work is definetely not based on facts. If you want to describe Schlaff as a bad man or as a villain, Wikipedia is not the right forum. I do not understand what your intentions are! If he commited crimes, we will report it (after the verdict). If not, we will not report it. You cite The Martin Schlaff Saga by Gidi Weitz six times, a trashy piece of tabloid journalism. (It was already mentioned in the section False accusations, before your changes). In addition, you cite Belton who cited Weitz without any verification. Rumors, hearsay, gossip and defamation.... I have to revert most of your changes. Please stay away from this article!--Gideon Hirsch (talk) 20:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Reliable sources. --Gideon Hirsch (talk) 22:14, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Yossi Maiman#Hearsay. --Gideon Hirsch (talk) 08:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 years for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:52, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.