Jump to content

User talk:Azar Altman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Azar Altman! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 22:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kyrgyzstan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 22:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you 🙏🏻 Azar Altman (talk) 12:54, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did at Demographics of Kazakhstan, may be confused with vandalism. Thank you. Mellk (talk) 07:46, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Tajikistan, you may be blocked from editing. Mellk (talk) 07:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you and don’t bubble over dude. You also changed a lot of things as well. Please get lost. Thank you Azar Altman (talk) 10:50, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 17:11, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Uzbekistan. TiggerJay (talk) 17:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear nobody! Firstly, I am making a contribution to Wikipedia. Secondly, I am updating all the old data to new official ones. I edited Tashkent because I was born and live in Tashkent and, unlike you, I know everything about my country and especially the city. Azar Altman (talk) 17:57, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for wanting to contribute but to contribute to Wikipedia there are guidelines and policies that must be followed. For example, just because you know something to be true is not sufficient and your location versus my location does NOT matter -- see this essay on why just because you know something is true does not matter. Beyond that you are reminded to be civil in your interactions with other users on here. Additionally when making changes, you are required to have a degree of competency in using the editing tools property, for example, your most recent edit here broke the reference template, because it was not used property. You can learn how to property reference/cite your sources at WP:REF. Again, your contributions are welcome, but please SLOW DOWN and makes sure you're using the tools property. Otherwise, you may find your account is blocked from further editing. TiggerJay (talk) 18:57, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ismail Samani. Your edit has been reverted because you improperly added information to the lead - we do not include locations here. Additionally, as you've been previously warned, you need to ensure your edits are not destructive. You removed the comma from the end of the dates of life. TiggerJay (talk) 17:32, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editingwithout further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia Why are you exchanging official facts for disinformation? I looked at all your articles where you edited many articles without reason, violating the Wikipedia rules. Azar Altman (talk) 19:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TiggerJay (talk) 19:34, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cheater and liar 😂 Azar Altman (talk) 05:34, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry you feel that way, but being uncivil in your communication is not a way to help your cause, but rather to have your block further extended. Let me encourage you to take a moment and read everything other editors have posted above so you can be informed on how to positively contribute. TiggerJay (talk) 06:30, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Tashkent

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tashkent, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:56, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uzbekistan & GINI data

[edit]

I reverted your edit because that data is incorrect and from an unreliable source. The website you are sourcing does not have current information and the data they provided is not property referenced, but rather they're just a general data aggregator. That was also the same problem with the prior GINI number provided by someone else. The most accurate number is from 2022, properly sourced as 31.2 coming from [1] but also supported by the entry over at List of countries by income inequality. When sourcing such data, please try to find the most accurate sources. If you believe you have a more authoritative source on GINI than World Bank or CIA World Factbook, you're welcome to use the article talk page to discuss your GINI sources. A third revert of this information will be treated as vandalism in accordance with the three-revert-rule. TiggerJay (talk) 19:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 22:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Drmies: perhaps they need more time to learn how to be CIVIL per this diff. TiggerJay (talk) 06:28, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Uzbekistan. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TiggerJay (talk) 03:52, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Azar Altman. Thank you. TiggerJay (talk) 04:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Drmies (talk) 13:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Azar Altman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Drmies,I would like to apologize for the mistakes I made due to my inexperience. I promise not to make such mistakes in the future Azar Altman (talk) 16:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Dear Drmies,I would like to apologize for the mistakes I made due to my inexperience. I promise not to make such mistakes in the future [[User:Azar Altman|Azar Altman]] ([[User talk:Azar Altman#top|talk]]) 16:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear Drmies,I would like to apologize for the mistakes I made due to my inexperience. I promise not to make such mistakes in the future [[User:Azar Altman|Azar Altman]] ([[User talk:Azar Altman#top|talk]]) 16:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear Drmies,I would like to apologize for the mistakes I made due to my inexperience. I promise not to make such mistakes in the future [[User:Azar Altman|Azar Altman]] ([[User talk:Azar Altman#top|talk]]) 16:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Azar Altman (talk) 16:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Hi! It can help to be more precise in your unblock request, to show that you understand specifically which mistakes you made (and will not do) and why they were problematic. There are several issues you can address, such as non-constructive edits you made (explaining how you understand that they were problematic, and proposing constructive edits you would make once unblocked), personal attacks against other editors (I can suggest you to look at Wikipedia:No personal attacks#Why personal attacks are harmful), and the fact that you created a second account to evade your block (you may, for instance, suggest a one-account restriction as a conditional unblock).
Doing this might not mean your unblock request will be automatically accepted (it is of course at the discretion of the reviewing administrator), but it would be a step in the correct direction. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Azar_Altman&oldid=1268265277"