User talk:Izzizm

January 2025

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Structure of feeling, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sokoreq (talk) 20:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Izzizm Please don't blank the article and don't add content without reliable references. Please discuss your disagreement on the article's talk page with your concerns and references. Sokoreq (talk) 21:19, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt add content, I just removed content because it wasnt correctly referenced , and I removed references that were attributed to Williams that were not actually Williams.

This is a bizarre article, because its proporting to be about William's concept, but it is actually about other writers interpretation of his concept (including, it seems, previous editors of the article)

Its important that the article objectively explains Williams's concept and uses his quotes, correctly attributed to his texts. At the moment none of Williams's texts are attributed in the article. Surely the most reliable references are the books Williams himself wrote ? Izzizm (talk) 21:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Izzizm Please discuss all your disagreements about the article content on the Talk:Structure of Feeling page, with reliable references. Thanks Sokoreq (talk) 21:41, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I presume this is a bot since you dont appear to have any connection to the article or have read my comments. apologies if that's incorrect. I have started a talk page on the article. Izzizm (talk) 21:48, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, i am a human, you are free to edit but plese doesn't blank an article just because you disagree with content, first discuss on talk page with references. Sokoreq (talk) 21:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thats fine and I am happy to do that. I had presumed that because you were linked to the page you would have knowledge of Williams and therefore be able to consider my points. Clearly you have a different role and that is absolutely fine. Thankyou for your advice. I have started a talk page with references. I hope people will engage with it because at the moment the article is very inaccurate and misleading. best wishes Izzizm (talk) 22:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Izzizm, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Sokoreq (talk) 21:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]