Jump to content

User talk:JFHJr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
In recognition of your excellent work throughout Wikipedia, but especially with respect to the BLP noticeboard. I have great respect for those who don't just comment but actually go and fix articles. Mojo Hand (talk) 00:22, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Mojo Hand! JFHJr () 02:11, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joyous Season

[edit]

Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, friend! And a Good Yule to you! I wish you a happy and healthy start to longer days and a new year. Cheers! JFHJr () 18:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For your help with the BLP issues over at Talk:Maynard James Keenan. Your assistance is highly appreciated! JeffSpaceman (talk) 00:05, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you, JeffSpaceman. The barnstar was rather unexpected for what little I did! I'm just one WP:BLPN volunteer among many, some of whom may offer even more detailed or active feedback. I appreciate the barnstar, but please don't feel like you should give it just because I had feedback or agreed with you in this instance. That said, I appreciate your sentiment: it's nice to be heard. Thanks again and you're very welcome. Cheers! JFHJr () 00:45, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand where you're coming from, but I was still happy to see someone step in and provide commentary on the situation, regardless of how much was done. Once again, I appreciate the assistance here, as well as the confirmation of my suspicion of WP:UNDUE weight on a BLP article (not to mention the WP:BLPGOSSIP problems I hadn't even originally considered). JeffSpaceman (talk) 01:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Raoul Minot DYK?

[edit]

Hi, excellent work on Raoul Minot; have you considered proposing a WP:DYK for it? —130.44.133.157 (talk) 03:16, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm not interested in DYK. But if you'd like to, you can. JFHJr () 03:28, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
PS. The article is stale by DYK metrics (way over 7 days old), so you're left with "expand[ing it] fivefold, or promot[ing it] to good article status." And whichever you do has a shelf life of a whole 7 days for DYK consideration. 💩🔨 So good luck on your idea, but I will just stay out of the way. JFHJr () 04:20, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]