User talk:MSincccc

Links

Please explain why this edit was made. What makes links "unnecessary"? ―Panamitsu (talk) 10:10, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

First of all, some of the sources(BBC News, The Guardian, etc.) were linked multiple times which constitutes overlinking. Also, quite a number of them were not linked at all. Thus, as you can see, the linking was inconsistent and it was hence unnecessary. Regards MSincccc (talk) 11:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Take a look at MOS:LINKONCE, which states that "there is no problem with repeating the same link in many citations within an article". If an article had no links at all, and someone added a link to say, San'yō-Onoda, would you revert that change because it ruins the consistency? I think not; articles should have links. Please self revert. ―Panamitsu (talk) 04:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

@Panamitsu Note: I have restored your revision.

• I can't see the rationale behind

linking the same source used in some of the citations and not doing so for the other citations at the same time.

• If an article had no links at all, and someone added a link to say, San'yō-Onoda, would you revert that change because it ruins the consistency? I think not; articles should have links.

As to this comment of yours, I can't see why articles should not have links. I never objected to that.

The point of discussion is sources having blue links and more specifically, all of them having it rather than just a select few.

Looking forward to your response and any future collaborations. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 10:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

@Panamitsu Since you were the one to start this conversation, I would like to ensure that we are cleared from both ends and that there exists no ambiguity with regards to the above. Also, hopefully we can collaborate in the future. Do reach out if you need any assistance. Looking forward to your response. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 15:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

Yes I agree. Apologies for the late response -- I have a script that prevents me from using talk pages late in the evening. If you'd like to collaborate, for the past while I've been thinking about creating an article for the 1986 royal tours, specifically the part of New Zealand, where for some reason the Queen got some eggs thrown on her. ―Panamitsu (talk) 22:34, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of official overseas trips made by William, Prince of Wales, and Catherine, Princess of Wales, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Vogue, Insider and Vanity Fair.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

Princess of Wales military ranks

I've seen that you reverted my edit to the "Catherine, Princess of Wales" voice, as the matter is "Already covered in the article". Very respectfully and in the most friendly terms, it doesn't look entirely so. If I'm not mistaken, her ranks/titles in the 1st Queen's Dragoon Guard, the Fleet Air Arm, and RAF Coningsby have been omitted, as well as the sponsorship of HMS Glasgow, and her title of Honorary Air Commander of the RAF Air Cadets is misquoted as Commodore of Air Command of the Air Training Corps (in the "Honorary titles box") or as "patron of the RAF Cadets" (in the "Military and armed force" paragraph). Actually the only military rank/title that looks correctly given is the Irish Guards colonelcy. Considering that the edit adds relevant information that are missing in the voice, and that the information has been grouped together for ease of consultation in the most concise form, are you sure that the revert is justified? I'm not even remotely willing to start any quarrel of edit war about the matter, just asking you, in the most relaxed and collaborative terms, to reconsider the revert. All the best (and season's geetings!) Arturolorioli (talk) 14:59, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

The following information has been covered in the article List of titles and honours of Catherine, Princess of Wales and hence has been omitted from the main article. It was done upon recommendations from reviewers at FAC to trim down the section. You are welcome to start a discussion on the article's talk page as well. Looking forward to your response. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 15:39, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Also the edits you made were to a sub-section under the section "Charity work", which covers her notable charitable endeavours in the concerned areas. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 15:40, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Hello MSincccc: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 15:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Abishe (talk) 15:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

Векочел (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Векочел (talk) 17:04, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Nadolig Llawen

Nadolig Llawen a Blwyddyn Newydd Dda.
Happy Christmas and Best wishes for a peaceful 2025: "Gabriel's Message" performed by the Winchester Cathedral Choir.
("Birjina gaztetto bat zegoen", Basque folk carol)

---

Martinevans123 (talk) 18:45, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

December music

story · music · places

Thank you for your note! My first Christmas story is about Gelobet seist du, Jesu Christ, BWV 91, 300 years today, and its song, 500 years old. Enjoy the season! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for notifying me @Gerda Arendt. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 18:51, 25 December 2024 (UTC)