User talk:Nraduns

December 2024

Welcome!

Hello, Nraduns, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Wilsonville (Triple Tree), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Drew Stanley (talk) 23:19, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wilsonville (Triple Tree)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wilsonville (Triple Tree), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drew Stanley (talk) 23:19, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nraduns (talk) 00:37, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 00:19, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nraduns (talk) 16:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nraduns (talk) 16:31, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Nraduns (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I made a serious mistake by moving the article from my sandbox to the main article space. At the time I did not understand that I was making the entry public. The copied material was being used as a starting point for my research and I unintentionally published it. I am deeply sorry for attempting to write an article before actually understanding how to use Wikipedia. I now understand the content policies and I will not do it again.

Accept reason:

The blocking admin has been otherwise active during the four days the request for their input has been here, so we can assume they have no input. I agree with the below comment that warning would have been preferable to an immediate indefinite no-warning block. However, you should be aware that Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, much more so than much of the rest of the internet, and as has been stated below, copyrighted material is entirely forbidden here, even in your user space. Please make sure you keep that in mind going forward.Welcome back. El Beeblerino ^{if you're not into the whole brevity thing} 22:55, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, and thank you for your unblock request! Please note that the error was not merely in moving the article from the sandbox to the mainspace. You should not even have copyrighted material in your sandbox. However, moving the content to the mainspace did make the error more egregious. That said, I would argue that you should have received a warning before being blocked. Bbb23, what are your thoughts about an unblock, given this appears to be the first violation? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Triple Tree Aerodrome (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Beachweak was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More sources that aren't from the company themselves are to be desired. A lot of the article is also totally unsourced in general.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Triple Tree Aerodrome and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Beachweak (talk) 10:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nraduns! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Beachweak (talk) 10:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]