Jump to content

User talk:Orfen/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 8 18 February 2008 About the Signpost

From the editorFrom the editor
Features and admins
Features and admins

Volume 4, Issue 9 25 February 2008 About the Signpost

Michael Snow interview
Signpost interview: Michael Snow
Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 10 3 March 2008 About the Signpost

Bureaucratship candidacies
Eleven users apply for bureaucratship
Domas Mituzas interview
Signpost interview: Domas Mituzas
Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 11 13 March 2008 About the Signpost

From the editorFrom the editor
Features and admins
Features and admins

Volume 4, Issue 12 17 March 2008 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:29, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 13 24 March 2008 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:54, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 14 31 March 2008 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.

Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 08:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 15 7 April 2008 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Volume 4, Issue 16 14 April 2008 About the Signpost

From the editorFrom the editor
Image placeholders
Image placeholders debated
Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 17 21 April 2008 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:16, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

DVD release date

Hi, I'd really want to know The Black Parade Is Dead! release date. In it's article discussion, you said Warner Bros. sent an e-mail about that... did you recive it?? How do you know that!! --Moraleh 21:09, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! --Moraleh (talk) 21:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

The Black Parade Is Dead! Tracklist

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to The Black Parade Is Dead!, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 12:37, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 18 2 May 2008 About the Signpost

From the editorFrom the editor
Arbitrator resigns
Arbitrator leaves Wikipedia
Features and admins
Features and admins

Volume 4, Issue 19 9 May 2008 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 20 12 May 2008 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:21, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

i didnt do it

im sorry my brother got on my laptop i wasnt the one to do it :(--67.68.14.181 (talk) 03:23, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Well tell your brother (and his online friends) to leave my accounts the f**k alone or I'll warn you and your brother. --Girla PurpleHeart (talk) 18:16, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for vandalism

Thanks for vandalize my account. I know, there are a bunch of trolls online, but that happens to some users. Again, thanks for the vandalism. --Girla PurpleHeart (talk) 18:25, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

After determining that you can be trusted not to abuse rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep these things in mind when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback can only be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you do not want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message on my talk page. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 01:06, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

when i was

Hi! I updated the review of The Black Parade now as requested. It's definitly a B now good job! I also added some commentary to examine over to move the article into possible GA territory. Keep up the great work! Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:58, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 21 19 May 2008 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Volume 4, Issue 22 26 May 2008 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:08, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 23 2 June 2008 About the Signpost

Board elections
Board elections open
Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:29, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Orfen! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Daniel (talk) 06:06, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 24 9 June 2008 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:20, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 25 23 June 2008 About the Signpost

From the editorFrom the editor
Features and admins
Features and admins

Volume 4, Issue 26 26 June 2008 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:57, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

The Black Parade article

Great job again! Your truly have a passion for it all. It's pretty good so far. The section on the band's influence is pretty good but it doesn't really explain why it's a "post-hardcore" or "alternative rock" album yet. Try to find definitions for those styles from either allmusic, or even better by using a book to cite it so it's comparable to My Chemical Romance. Another good example is with my little knowledge of the band is how this album differs from previous albums (i'm pretty sure it does!). Some more reviews could be added to the Infobox, make sure not to go over ten and make it presentable and us italics when needed. For example, you refer to the Entertainment Weekly review in the reception, but don't have it in the infobox. Someone might jump you on that one. Another thing as an option would be explaing music's themes and what not. This would be a good section to combine with another section which could be useful about the album's "story" as it's a concept album apparently.

That's...all I can think of for now. Great job all around. Even if you can't get all those, I'd attempt giving this a peer review and a GA or if you are feeling jumpy just add some more then hop the GA wagon. Take a look at some of the other GA album articles for alternative rock bands to get some ideas of what would be good to add as well! Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

It seems ok though there are a few points. Only the earliest release date should be mentioned (Wikipedia:ALBUM#Released) and the use of flagicons in that way is discouraged. A few more professional reviews might help. The lead should probably contain more about why the album is notable, chart positions etc. I hate the phrase "The album spawned four singles", it didnt give birth to them. I prefer "Four singles were released from the album". The phrase "The Black Parade has, overall, been a critical success" contradicts the info in the 'Reception' section which suggests there were some negative reviews, this would fail WP:NPOV. The inclusion of Concept albums in the see also section is suspect as the article doesn't mention it and i'm not sure it can be considered a concept album in the purest sense. That's all i got for now. --neon white talk 01:36, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 30, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 27 30 June 2008 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:52, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

What's wrong with this article?--Greenday21 (talk) 16:05, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Greenday21

Happy 1st edit day

Happy First Edit Day, Orfen/Archive 4, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

America69 (talk) 15:02, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day

Happy First Edit Day, Orfen, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! User:Orfen (talk) 06:26, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Idontknow610TM 19:50, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

My RFA Thanks

Thank you for your support at my RFA, which has closed as a success. Thank yuo also for yor compliments about my answers and my edtiing style. I promisce to be as diliggent in the furtue as I was then and I will be nwo whilste I am writting my thnaks. Seriously though, your support means a lot, and I look forward to working with you in the future. StephenBuxton (talk) 22:12, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 7, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 28 7 July 2008 About the Signpost

From the editorFrom the editor: Transparency
Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:09, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

RfA thank you

Thank you!
Orfen, it is with deep awareness of the responsibility conferred by your trust that I am honored to report that in part to your support, my request for adminship passed (87/14/6). I deeply value the trust you and the Wikipedia community have in me, and I will embark on a new segment of my Wikipedia career by putting my new tools to work to benefit the entire community. My best to you, Happyme22 (talk) 03:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 14 and 21, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 29 14 July 2008 About the Signpost

From the editorFrom the editor: Transparency
Features and admins
Features and admins

Volume 4, Issue 30 21 July 2008 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:00, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Adoption

Hi Orfen,

I'm reasonably computer literate, but I don't know where to start with all this.

I'm trying to create a Wiki listing for Sally Garozzo, a UK singer-songwriter who is shortly due to release her second album and will be touring the north west to promote it.

I'd like to learn how to contribute to Wikipedia anyway, but I wanted to check in the first instance whether Sally would be considered note-worthy enough to create a listing for. I'd hate to put a lot of time and effort in now only for a listing to be removed, when I could have picked it up over time.

Anyway, I'm not sure if I'll even know how to check to see if you've written back, so my email address is simonbirdsey@yahoo.co.uk just in case.

Looking forward to talking to you.

Simon(Simonbirdsey (talk) 18:43, 22 August 2008 (UTC))

Signpost updated for July 28, August 9, 11 and 18, 2008.

Sorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 05:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 31 28 July 2008 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Volume 4, Issue 32 9 August 2008 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Volume 4, Issue 33 11 August 2008 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Volume 4, Issue 34 18 August 2008 About the Signpost

From the editorFrom the editor: Help wanted
Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Saint Fink

Hello, I am Saint Fink, a hero for the gothics, the emos, the punk rockers, and others.--Saint Fink (talk) 01:18, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

helpme saint fink

Hey orfen, I was Wondering if you could help me. You know n how you have that red squares, well is it posible for you to tell me how to get some blue or green squares on my page, i'd realy appriciate it.--Saint Fink (talk) 20:48, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

nethermind--Saint Fink (talk) 01:12, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

"Our Lady of Sorrows"

Friginator has brought up the fact that "Our Lady of Sorrows" has no source that lists it as a single. Since you created the page I was wondering if you have any additional information. Please respond on Friginator's talk page. Thanks. – Zntrip 00:48, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the redirect on Our Lady of Sorrows. Still not sure whether Vampires Will Never Hurt You counts as a single or not, due to the music video. I'm still looking for an actual copy, but there's always the possibility that very few were produced. --User:Friginator 17:03, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 25 and September 8, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 35 25 August 2008 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Volume 4, Issue 36 8 September 2008 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the message! Do you mind if we talk over email? You can contact me at tzuzul@hbs.edu

Tiona75 (talk) 22:20, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


The Black Parade Genre

In response to your message on my talk page: The reason I referred you back to my talk page is that I feel there are better ways to discuss this than through edit wars. The IGN quote you mentioned does make a specific case against the "emo" classification for this specific album, even if it doesn't insist upon it. As long as there are reliable sources, and something is open to interpretation, you can't just go around stating it as fact. Encyclopedias are based on stating the facts, not the opinions. "Emo" is an opinion, and if there are conflicting sources then you can't pick sides. No one is suggesting that Wikipedia insist that it is not emo, but until there is some sort of infallible proof that the album is unarguably emo, we can't go around stating what only SOME of the critics interpret. What I don't understand is why you think staying neutral is in itself some kind of bias. How can the album meet criteria for the "emo" genre if those criteria don't exist? There's no specific way to verify arbitrary claims. If something can't be proven, you don't state it to be true on an encyclopedia. Reviews and consensus don't count as proof of something, especially if other reviews and consensus point otherwise. About your new sources: neither actually reviews the album, they both just cite a review from allmusic that you already cited. Plus, neither of them list "emo" as the genre, just one of several styles. Even if you are going to go against the very purpose of having an Encyclopedia, you still would have to come up with ONE reliable source stating that this album genre IS emo, which you still have not. Coming to conclusions like that because-- "I don't see why the [as of yet ungiven] sources don't point to emo" --violates WP:OR.--Friginator 03:32, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Good idea about getting an outside opinion. The argument was getting repetetive. I've just posted the whole discussion on the Reliable Sources noticeboard. --Friginator 06:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

"Vampires Will Never Hurt You"

I found a picture of the "Vampires Will Never Hurt You" single, but Friginator still insists that the evidence is inadequate. I think your input would be appreciated. – Zntrip 23:52, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 15, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 37 15 September 2008 About the Signpost


Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:05, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Ray Toro

As per WP:MUSIC#Criteria for musicians and ensembles

Note that members of notable bands are redirected to the band's article, not given individual articles, unless they have demonstrated individual notability for activity independent of the band, such as solo releases. Members of two notable bands are generally notable enough for their own article.

He has not demonstrated any notability outside of MCR and thus the article should redirect to the band. Cheers Nouse4aname (talk) 10:34, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

AAU reminder notice

A friendly reminder from the Adopt-a-User project =)
Hey there Orfen! This is a friendly reminder to update your status at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User/Adoptee's Area/Adopters whenever it is appropriate in order to provide new users with the most up-to-date information on available adopters. Also please note that we will be removing adopters who have not edited in 60 days. If you become active again (and we hope you do!) please feel free to re-add yourself. Cheers!

Looking for an editor to look over a new page on Fast fashion

Needed, an editor to look over the formatting and content of Fast fashion. The article is currently in its primary stages of developement right now, and was developed from a very brief stub. Any suggestions, help, or questions are welcome!!! Help needed as soon as possible. Thanks

Smeast08Smeast08 (talk) 18:20, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12:20 21 Novemeber 2008

Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.

Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 42 8 November 2008 About the Signpost

From the editorFrom the editor
Features and admins
Features and admins

Volume 4, Issue 43 10 November 2008 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Volume 4, Issue 44 17 November 2008 About the Signpost

Wikimedia Deutschland case
Lawsuit briefly shuts down Wikipedia.de
Wikimedia events
Wikimedia Events Roundup
Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009

Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.


The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 45 24 November 2008 About the Signpost

From the editorFrom the editor: 200th issue
Features and admins
Features and admins

Volume 4, Issue 46 1 December 2008 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Volume 5, Issue 1 3 January 2009 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 2 10 January 2009 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 20:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 3 17 January 2009 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 00:46, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 4 24 January 2009 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Delivered at 04:43, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Non-article My Chemical Romance pages, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Non-article My Chemical Romance pages has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Non-article My Chemical Romance pages, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 10:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 31, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 5 31 January 2009 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 21:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 6 8 February 2009 About the Signpost

Features and admins
Features and admins

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:36, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Adoptee Request

Hi Orfen,

I noticed on Adoptee Resources that you are open to helping out new Wiki users. I've been working on a couple of articles that I think are close to being ready to publish. Before I go any further, I'd really appreciate an experienced user's point of view.

I searched Wiki and noticed that other companies had a page for the company and separate ones for their products, so I did the same. The two articles are:

  • PAC International - company
  • RSIC-1 - product

In developing these articles, I tried to make sure the content had a NPOV as well as citations for notability from various sources.

Any comments/suggestions you have about the content, wiki formatting, etc., would be greatly appreciated.

Best regards,

Eyoreboy (talk) 19:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009

The Signpost
Volume 5, Issue 7
Weekly Delivery
2009-02-16

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 07:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 16:49, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:30, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


The Wikipedia Signpost  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!

I'll remember that next time, thank you for the tip! :) Papercutbiology♫ (talk) 10:27, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:22, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:41, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 20 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:01, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:36, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Message from the My Chemical Romance task force

Hello!

You may be interested to know that the WikiProject My Chemical Romance has recently been transformed into a task force of WikiProject Emo. Please visit the task force page to see what's new. This move allies the task force with a larger WikiProject that handles much of the administrative overload, thus allowing task force members to focus on the most important activity: article improvement.

The project's membership list has also been moved to the new task force page. If you see that your username is in the "Inactive/former members" section, please do not take offense; this is because you no longer appear to be active on Wikipedia. We may also take the liberty of removing the member userbox from your userpage if it appears there, to prevent you from automatically appearing in Category:My Chemical Romance task force members. Of course you are free to rejoin the task force and re-add the userbox at any time if you would like to become active again.

For active editors, it is our hope that this change will help spur you to improve articles related to My Chemical Romance. You may have noticed that the old My Chemical Romance project userbox on your user page has automatically changed to the new task force userbox. We may take the liberty of fixing the template link on your userpage, to avoid redirects.

Thank you and we hope you will continue to support the My Chemical Romance task force!

--IllaZilla (talk) 01:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:11, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:57, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:47, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Happy WikiBirthday (a couple days late)

I saw from here that it's been exactly three years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 13:27, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:59, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:10, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:18, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Happy first edit day!

HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY! from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE

Wishing Orfen/Archive 4 a very Happy First Edit Day!

Have a fantastic day!

From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

--I dream of horses (talk) 19:41, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:15, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Canadian Wannabees.png

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Canadian Wannabees.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 04:49, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 12:12, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:New Canadian Wannabees Sign.png

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:New Canadian Wannabees Sign.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 05:06, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 3 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:31, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:53, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:27, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 24 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:36, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009

GA reassessment of Green Day

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the article which you can see at Talk:Green Day/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:10, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010

The Signpost: 16 August 2010

The Signpost: 23 August 2010

The Signpost: 30 August 2010

The Signpost: 6 September 2010

The Signpost: 13 September 2010

The Signpost: 20 September 2010

The Signpost: 27 September 2010

The Signpost: 4 October 2010

The Signpost: 11 October 2010

The Signpost: 18 October 2010

The Signpost: 25 October 2010