User talk:Singh.sksps

November 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ravidas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:39, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Manusmriti— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:27, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, I'm Ivanvector. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Kalki, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 15:29, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of the named Buddhas, you may be blocked from editing. Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 18:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Gotitbro (talk) 18:48, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 19:01, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Singh.sksps, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Gotitbro (talk) 02:12, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Singh.sksps. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 23:53, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

This user has engaged in block evasion as BuddhaShakya in July, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 15:33, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

edit warring

Please see User:dlohcierekim/ew for information on appealing blocks for WP:edit warring. Possibly moot in light of recent events. Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:14, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]