User talk:Stephclive

This is Stephclive's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xanthe Mosley (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment they left was:

Do not wp:REFSPAM - use only one good source for each fact. One does not inherit notability from family members, so the emphasis on peerage here is not helping the article. For references to print materials (hard copy) please provide a full citation, include authors and titles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Xanthe Mosley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 01:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Stephclive, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 01:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xanthe Mosley (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hermera34 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

I don't see the notability in this person. The references provided only identifies this person as an artist, which is really a trivial mention and not one describing how this person has developed new techniques or other notable discussion. For future submissions, please review the requirements for notability of artists at WP:ARTIST. Unless this can be satisfied, the article will fail because of notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Xanthe Mosley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hermera34 (talk) 11:09, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ivo Mosley has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ivo Mosley. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 04:30, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ivo Mosley has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ivo Mosley. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:25, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Xanthe Mosley

Hello, Stephclive. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Xanthe Mosley".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivo Mosley (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft reads as if its primary purpose is to advertise Mosley's books.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ivo Mosley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nearly all of the edits that you have done have been about the Mosleys. Do you have a connection with them? If so, please declare it in accordance with the conflict of interest guideline. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivo Mosley (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Many of the references are incomplete, we need complete bibliographic information, so that a reader would be able to find the exact referenced source. In the case of newspapers and magazines that means the article title, author's name, page number, magazine/newspaper title and place of publication. You can use the {{cite news}} or {{cite magazine}} templates to assist you to include all the relevant information. If the article is available online please include a link in the reference.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ivo Mosley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:29, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ivo mosley

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ivo mosley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MereTechnicality (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rayman60 (talk) 14:48, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]