User talk:Submackeen

Welcome!

Hello, Submackeen, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! jlwoodwa (talk) 21:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Submackeen. Thank you for your work on Whoopy Crown. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

the word "crown" isn't mentioned in the target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: I'd argue that the shape of the hat itself warrants the redirect to exist, as it is physically similar to a crown. However, if you deem it unnecessary, its removal is fine by me. Submackeen (talk) 02:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

if you deem it unnecessary This isn't what I meant. If the phrase "whoopy crown" is used for "whoopie cap", then you should add that phrase (with a ref) to the article. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your (partial) reversion of my edit to "Whoopee cap"

Greetings and felicitations. I noticed that you reverted my edit to Whoopee cap with the subsequent edit comment "Previous edit reinstated partially." I'd like to point out that portal templates are (as I moved it in my edit) customarily placed at the top of the "See also" section, and that my other changes were not necessarily "unnecessary". The addition of a carriage return between the two items at the at the top of the article IMHO makes it easier to edit, quotation marks in the reference title are double quotes inside of double quotes, and alphabetizing the "See also" links make them easier to find. In light of this, may I please reimplement them? —DocWatson42 (talk) 12:07, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I had just woken up so I definetly didn't thuroughly inspect them. submackeen Submackeen (talk) 18:24, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. —DocWatson42 (talk) 00:56, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Currently there is a slight issue with the part referencing the felt crown and the link for its reference. I'm not able to correct it myself given I'm an editing novice. Would you be able to correct that? submackeen Submackeen (talk) 21:08, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and done. It was the comma in the <ref> tag. DocWatson42 (talk) 01:17, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! submackeen Submackeen (talk) 02:27, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. ^_^ DocWatson42 (talk) 03:02, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]