Hello, The revealer! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! — Masum Ibn Musa Conversation17:02, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The revealer,
Your recent edits to List of inventions in the medieval Islamic world have some problems, including use sources that do not meet the standards of WP:RS and
presentist wording. Are you getting these sources from a single place, such as wikipedia history or muslimheritage.com? A large cleanup of sumilar claims and sourcing took place some yaers ago: Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Jagged 85/Cleanup, and it is important to maintain high quality sourcing and not reintroduce content that needs cleanup. If you have questions about this or any specific source, please let me know or discuss on the relevant article talk page.Dialectric (talk) 16:02, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dialectric No! The books which have been cited, I have read myself. If it's needed, I'll add more references. But please don't revert my edits, I've worked hard.
Most references I have given are of good quality (Ehsan Masood, M. H. Morgan), one or two maybe not that good. But some are very strong (1001 Inventions, Seyyed Hossain Nasr). And yes, in some cases I have taken references from other Wikipedia pages. I'll remove the low-quality ones and cite more references.The revealer (talk) 09:29, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I have added few more references and have cleaned up the less good quality ones. I wasn't sure about those and had hit the button 'watch this page' because of that. Now all the references given are strong enough. You may have a look. If you find anything inappropriate then delete that one and notify me. But please don't revert all my edits, I have worked hard.The revealer (talk) 09:29, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoaib Ahmed Malik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:36, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nazmul Hoque Nadwi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
