User talk:Wikiman2021language

Wikiman2021language, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Wikiman2021language! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Wikiman2021language! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Helen(💬📖) 22:40, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Baloch people, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Per Wikipedia's guidelines; 1) you need to use edit summaries for the edits you make and 2) reliable sources must be added for the material you add to articles. So far, you've been reverted on numerous occassions for adding unsourced/unreliably sourced WP:OR to articles. If this continues, you will be reported to ANI. Thanks, - LouisAragon (talk) 09:21, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - LouisAragon (talk) 17:07, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information. El_C 05:17, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Vaghri language, you may be blocked from editing. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:30, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Southern Turkmen

The article Southern Turkmen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The references which I have looked at talk about Turkmen, but not about "Southern Turkmen" specifically.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Biddulph (talk) 05:09, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Southern Turkmen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Southern Turkmen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Turkmen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

David Biddulph (talk) 05:55, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruption and addition of unsourced content, refusal to discuss. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]