User talk:Yashvant.ritesh
Hello, Yashvant.ritesh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
- Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
- Check out some of these pages:
- If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 03:20, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
- Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
- In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
- Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
- Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>
, copy the whole thing). - In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
- If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References== {{Reflist}}
June 2024
[edit]Hello Yashvant.ritesh! Your additions to Mount Abu InfraRed Observatory have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
- Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
- Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
- Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
- Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 07:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
September 2024
[edit]Hello, Yashvant.ritesh. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to sources you may be affiliated with.
Editing in this way is a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM); the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.
If you wish to continue contributing, please first consider citing other reliable secondary sources such as review articles that were written by other researchers in your field and that are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite sources for which you may have a conflict of interest, please start a new section on the article's talk page and add {{Edit COI}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.
MrOllie (talk) 13:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Sir, your conclusion is mistaken in my humble opinion. Of all the edits I have ever done on Wikipedia, only 2 referred to my paper.
- I humbly believe you wouldn't conclude the same if you take into account the history of this paper. The paper was written as a result of not finding enough material on the Mark I Perceptron in the Wikipedia page.
- I asked this question on 16 July 2023 after finding that the Wikipedia page had woefully inadequate information on Mark I. The question went unanswered. The question describes how Wikipedia doesn't have the information.
- I undertook a long research project to find the information. I presented my findings on 15 March 2024 and published them on 21 May 2024 .
- I went back to the question and answered it on May 31st 2024 to help the community.
- I added the information to Wikipedia on 18th September 2024 to help the future readers.
- Yashvant.ritesh (talk) 16:34, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Of all the edits I have ever done on Wikipedia, only 2 referred to my paper.
That's not an accurate count.I humbly believe you wouldn't conclude the same if you take into account the history of this paper.
I have reviewed the history of the paper and I continue to come to the same conclusion - you were editing with a conflict of interest and should not have added the reference. MrOllie (talk) 16:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)- Sir, you are a volunteer giving extraordinary amounts of time for public good. It would be selfish of me to take more of your time by getting into a debate with you. I promise to try my best to make contributions without citing my works unless absolutely relevant and pertinent.
- I have revisited all my edits, and there were 3 that referred to my works. I had forgotten an earlier one years ago.
- However, please allow me to add that if you ever find time to read any of those, you will find that they were absolutely relevant and pertinent. They absolutely added accurate and useful information and added an important perspective which was not present on Wikipedia. In my humble opinion, all three of those did public good.
- Be that as it may, taking more of your time will do more public harm than whatever little public good those 3 edits did. However, I would like to record that they were only 3 out of total 72 edits that I have done. The other 69 didn't refer to my work and were done only with the intention of public good.
- In the light of this, may I reiterate that your conclusion that "my primary purpose on Wikipedia" is selfish is mistaken. Yashvant.ritesh (talk) 03:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- By the way, thank you so much for taking the time to check the history of the paper. It is truly extraordinarily kind of you. It is rare to find a person who tries to give a chance to those who they judge as being selfish and greedy. Yashvant.ritesh (talk) 04:11, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Sir, I have added an article related to the Mark I Perceptron: Draft:Mark I Perceptron - Wikipedia
- Could you please review it? I have tried to follow your guidance and not cited any of my works. Yashvant.ritesh (talk) 12:04, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark I Perceptron has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Lewisguile (talk) 20:29, 21 November 2024 (UTC)- I am deeply grateful to you and your team 🙏🏼🙏🏼 Yashvant.ritesh (talk) 05:29, 26 November 2024 (UTC)