Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Dallas Cowboys seasons/archive1
Appearance
List of Dallas Cowboys seasons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Hey man im josh (talk) 20:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
The Dallas Cowboys are, historically speaking, one of the NFL's most successful franchises, holding the second-highest all-time regular season record and having won 5 Super Bowls. The list is an overview of their season-by-season results and awards. This is #4 in my ongoing effort to get all of the lists of NFL team seasons to featured list. As always, I will do my best to be as responsive as possible and address all criticisms and suggestions that come up. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]- "Originally a member of the NFL Western Conference, the team was moved to the NFL Eastern Conference in 1961 after just one season, they remained in this conference until 1970." - this doesn't work grammatically. I would suggest either "Originally a member of the NFL Western Conference, the team was moved to the NFL Eastern Conference in 1961 after just one season; they remained in this conference until 1970." (note punctuation change) or "Originally a member of the NFL Western Conference, the team was moved to the NFL Eastern Conference in 1961 after just one season and remained in this conference until 1970."
- "the Cowboys division, the NFL Capitol Division" => "the Cowboys' division, the NFL Capitol Division"
- "total championships amongst all 32 NFL franchise" => "total championships amongst all 32 NFL franchises"
- "The team currently has had" - I believe the word "currently" is slightly frowned on, so change to "as of 2025"
- Image caption: "During which time he had 20 consecutive winning seasons" => "During this time he had 20 consecutive winning seasons"
- SuperBowl winning rows use a symbol which the key says relates only to years up to 1969....?
- Footnote: "Up to 1967, the league was either divided its two divisions into, two conferences, or neither" - this is a bit mangled. I think what is meant is "Up to 1967, the league was either divided into two divisions, two conferences, or neither" but I am no expert and might be wrong
- That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
"Originally a member of the NFL Western Conference, the team was moved to the NFL Eastern Conference in 1961 after just one season, they remained in this conference until 1970." - this doesn't work grammatically. I would suggest either "Originally a member of the NFL Western Conference, the team was moved to the NFL Eastern Conference in 1961 after just one season; they remained in this conference until 1970." (note punctuation change) or "Originally a member of the NFL Western Conference, the team was moved to the NFL Eastern Conference in 1961 after just one season and remained in this conference until 1970."
– Done with the punctuation change. I need to get better about utilizing semi colons"the Cowboys division, the NFL Capitol Division" -> "the Cowboys' division, the NFL Capitol Division"
– Done."total championships amongst all 32 NFL franchise" -> "total championships amongst all 32 NFL franchises"
– Pluralized"The team currently has had" - I believe the word "currently" is slightly frowned on, so change to "as of 2025"
– You're right, we do frown on that. Changed to simply "The team has had...", to match a past promotion. Also added to the beginning of the paragraph "As of the of the 2024 season...", which should clarify that the numbers in that paragraph apply to that entire paragraph.Image caption: "During which time he had 20 consecutive winning seasons" -> "During this time he had 20 consecutive winning seasons"
– Done.SuperBowl winning rows use a symbol which the key says relates only to years up to 1969....?
– Ack! Tried to use a consistent key across season articles and mistakenly left the old one in place. I've fixed this and double checked other symbols to be sure, and it should all be good now.Footnote: "Up to 1967, the league was either divided its two divisions into, two conferences, or neither" - this is a bit mangled. I think what is meant is "Up to 1967, the league was either divided into two divisions, two conferences, or neither" but I am no expert and might be wrong
– No you're right, I've made the fix, thank you.
- As always I greatly appreciate the feedback ChrisTheDude! Your suggestions always make the articles I work on better :) Hey man im josh (talk) 15:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]- "based in Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex." -> "based in the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex." History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:24, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- "Denver Broncos for second-most Super Bowl" -> "Denver Broncos for the second-most Super Bowl" History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:24, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- "New England Patriots' record 11 appearances." -> "New England Patriots' record of 11 appearances." History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:24, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- "amongst all 32 NFL franchise." -> "amongst all 32 NFL franchises." History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:24, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- If these are fixed then I support. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:24, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
"based in Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex." -> "based in the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex."
– Done."Denver Broncos for second-most Super Bowl" -> "Denver Broncos for the second-most Super Bowl"
– I believe the current phrasing is actually grammatically correct and approrpirate."New England Patriots' record 11 appearances." -> "New England Patriots' record of 11 appearances."
– The current phrasing is grammatically correct in my opinion."amongst all 32 NFL franchise." -> "amongst all 32 NFL franchises."
– Fixed per ChrisTheDude's comment about.
- Thank you for your review @History6042, but I recommend in the future you group your feedback under one reply instead of signing all points of it. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:45, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, will do, thanks for letting me know. History6042😊 (Contact me) 15:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Just to be entirely clear, have all your concerns been addressed @History6042? Hey man im josh (talk) 17:03, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, I found no other issues with the prose. History6042😊 (Contact me) 17:05, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Just to be entirely clear, have all your concerns been addressed @History6042? Hey man im josh (talk) 17:03, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, will do, thanks for letting me know. History6042😊 (Contact me) 15:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
OlifanofmrTennant
[edit]- Lead image has alt text and suitable caption
- Body images have alt text and suitable caption
- All images are from commons so no copyright issues
- Everything checks out so Support Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)