Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Australian law articles by quality log
 | This is a log of operations by a bot. The contents of this page are unlikely to need human editing. In particular, links should not be disambiguated as this is a historical record. |
January 10, 2025
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]January 9, 2025
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- AFACT v iiNet Ltd (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
January 8, 2025
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- David Eastman (wrongful conviction) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to B-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
January 7, 2025
[edit]Assessed
[edit]- David Eastman (wrongful conviction) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]- David Eastman (talk) removed.
January 6, 2025
[edit]Removed
[edit]January 5, 2025
[edit]Assessed
[edit]- LawConnect (software) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]- LawConnect (talk) removed.
January 4, 2025
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- Court of Disputed Returns renamed to Court of disputed returns.
Reassessed
[edit]- Australian court hierarchy (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Mid-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
- James Cockle (lawyer) (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Mid-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)