Jump to content

Talk:Minecraft: The Story of Mojang

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
Passed. Merry new year. Sorry this took so needlessly long. Chchcheckit (talk) 12:31, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Minecraft: The Story of Mojang/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BarntToust (talk · contribs) 19:03, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Chchcheckit (talk · contribs) 22:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


GARC. I'll start on this soon. // Chchcheckit (talk) 22:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Cursory stuff: no unreliable sources used, and no edit warring. All images present have appropriate rationale and are relevant to the topic. // Chchcheckit (talk) 13:30, 22 December 2024 (UTC) Copyvio max is 32.9% // Chchcheckit (talk) 13:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I've been worn out doing things and going to lots of places. I'm gonna survey the sources but the article appears fantastic. I'll try close this off soon/quickly. // Chchcheckit (talk) 12:09, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Chchcheckit, don't sweat it! Hope you've had a great time with the holidays. BarntToust 18:50, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also: what makes Critic's At Large a reliable source? I couldn't find it on Wikipedia Films/Sources. User:Rhain actually suggested that one. I added it because it's a bunch of critics and writers with prior work experience who apparently did a collective at one point. BarntToust 18:23, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, if that's the case, what's Justin Cummings' previous experience? // Chchcheckit (talk) 14:07, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
narrative designer at Ubisoft Toronto. wrote stuff for video games, which this is a film about the most popular one. Ubisoft is pretty lame as a company, but for some writer who has actually contributed to narratives in prominent entertainment products, I'd say he's got at least somewhat more of a valuable opinion than the average Comic Book Resources, Screen Rant, MovieWeb or Collider employee stationed down at the ol' content farm. BarntToust 16:09, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's enough cred, I guess. // Chchcheckit (talk) 18:39, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. any cred is better than none, regardless of whether he worked at a content farm. a resume is a resume. though dcfZsvrgfbd what am i saying. // Chchcheckit (talk) 18:41, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Formatting: I suggest you place the Cast below Content, and then put the images of Molyneux/Hecker/Schafer there due to MOS:SANDWICH of images.  Done

Yeah I'm good with the formatting. // Chchcheckit (talk) 14:07, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can add information about the folks who star. BarntToust 20:15, 29 December 2024 (UTC) [reply]
@Chchcheckit, added context for the folks who star. BarntToust 20:28, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'll fix the cast things per wikiproject film style guide. merry new year. //Chchcheckit (talk) 12:21, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spotchecks

  • checkY Minecraft: The Story of Mojang was well received. Verified by Gamespot, " the well-received documentary". Use of TheGamer, however is questionable: "The 10 Best Video Game Documentaries (According To Rotten Tomatoes)". Prose reads: "Just to be clear, we're going by the overall percentage from combining audience and critics scores." RT has no critic score for this film, only a user score (which at time of review sits at 90%.)  Done - removed questionable instance of TheGamer. BarntToust 16:13, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • checkY It was well received, gaining praise for its presentation, emotional aspect, charm, and value to fans, though its narrative and informative depth were questioned. Verified. Also, given lack of sourcees that provide reviews, can say it is neutral POV. // Chchcheckit (talk) 14:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • checkY The film also features interviews with prominent game creators Tim Schafer, Chris Hecker, and Peter Molyneux—the latter of whom was inspired by Persson's success to leave his job at Microsoft and found his own studio 22cans—who discuss the game's impact on them and their careers.[Eurogamer: 1][Kokatu: 2][PCGamesN: 3] In Molyneux's interview, he speaks on two perspectives of Minecraft's success: in the first, he views it in the lens of Lego toys, asserting that most contemporary video games compare with Lego sets, in that they are too structured and thus lacking in creative freedom, a crucial element that Minecraft returns to; his second perspective asserts that Minecraft's success should serve as a wake-up call to the video game industry to stop being "complacent" with its strategies.[3] Verified.

AAAAAAAAAAAgh. // Chchcheckit (talk) 12:21, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Minecraft:_The_Story_of_Mojang&oldid=1266404013"